Skip to main content

Is vitul.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA Vitul Reviews

S

Is vitul.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA Vitul

Check if vitul.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviasmall
jQueryLayerSliderContact Form 7BootstrapFont Awesome+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:48:04 PM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

SIA Vitul is a Latvian small business specializing in comprehensive service solutions including cargo handling, property maintenance, transport services, and territory cleaning. The company emphasizes providing complex solutions with equipment and labor to efficiently meet customer needs. Their market position appears local/regional with a focus on individualized customer service and operational efficiency. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using common plugins and libraries, with moderate performance and basic SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking advanced security headers and policies. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating compliance gaps. Contact information is clearly presented, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from improved security and privacy practices.

Detected Technologies

jQueryLayerSliderContact Form 7BootstrapFont AwesomeGoogle Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company targets businesses and property owners requiring logistical and maintenance services. Their business model relies on providing equipment and workforce to handle tasks that would otherwise require multiple vendors or resources. The presence of partner logos suggests some level of partnership ecosystem. Revenue streams likely come from service contracts and one-off jobs in transportation and property maintenance sectors. Growth indicators are not explicit but the website content and service diversity suggest a stable small business. The lack of detailed corporate information and certifications limits deeper business intelligence insights.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@inbox.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712955****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS, which are critical for mitigating common web attacks. No incident response or security policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. Forms are present but no advanced anti-bot or CAPTCHA mechanisms are detected, potentially exposing the site to spam or abuse. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations, which is a significant compliance gap for a European company. Overall, the security maturity is basic and improvements are recommended to enhance protection and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA Vitul

Description:

SIA Vitul provides complex solutions including cargo handling, property maintenance, transport services, and territory cleaning. They offer equipment and workers to efficiently manage tasks such as cleaning, loading containers, lawn maintenance, and window washing. The company emphasizes individualized customer approach and fast service completion.

Key Services:
Cargo HandlingProperty maintenanceTransport ServicesTerritory cleaningOther Services
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryLayerSliderContact Form 7BootstrapFont AwesomeGoogle Fonts
Frameworks:
WordPressVisual Composer
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Google FontsPaymill bridge
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.68.197 ip4:85.31.97.26 a mx ip4:91.203.68.160/27 -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 33 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

9 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.68.197
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: vitul.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025060400, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:157ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.68.197 ip4:85.31.97.26 a mx ip4:91.203.68.160/27 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Visual Composer and LayerSlider plugins, using jQuery and Bootstrap frameworks. The site loads multiple external resources including Google Fonts and Paymill payment bridge scripts. Performance is moderate with some potential for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good but accessibility features are basic. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The technical stack is common and stable but requires updates and security hardening to reduce risks.
Analyze Another Website