Skip to main content

Is vlpack.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Valeria Lux Reviews

vlpack.lv favicon

Is vlpack.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Valeria Lux

Check if vlpack.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingLatviasmall
jQueryjQuery ColorBox
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:55:15 PM
40
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Valeria Lux is a small manufacturing company specializing in packaging products such as correxes, blisters, trays, and related industrial packaging solutions. The website targets industrial and commercial clients seeking packaging services and displays certificates and awards to build trust. The technical infrastructure is basic, relying on jQuery and standard web technologies, with moderate performance and limited mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features. The absence of WHOIS data and domain registration details raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the website content and branding appear consistent with a legitimate small business. Overall, the site requires improvements in privacy compliance, contact transparency, and security best practices to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

jQueryjQuery ColorBox

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on packaging solutions for various industries including confectionery and fishing equipment. Its business model is B2B manufacturing and sales, with a regional market presence in Latvia. The website content suggests a niche market position supported by certifications and awards. The lack of detailed company information and contact data limits transparency. The partnership with a local web developer (MegaSoft) indicates a small-scale operation. Growth potential may be constrained by limited digital presence and minimal marketing tools.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could expose it to clickjacking and content injection risks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, reducing readiness for security events. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking without visible privacy controls. Overall, the security posture is basic and requires enhancements to meet modern standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Valeria Lux

Description:

Manufacturer and supplier of packaging products including correxes, blisters, trays, hygiene and ISO certificates, awards, and recommendation letters.

Key Services:
Production of correxes and confectionery traysPackaging for small industrial productsPackaging for fishing equipmentBlister packagingManufacture of forms and clichésAwards and certificates issuance
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryjQuery ColorBox
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 88 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
26 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(551 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:81.94.233.3
Name Servers:
pns11.cloudns.net
pns12.cloudns.net
pns13.cloudns.net
pns14.cloudns.net
MX Records:
10: mail.valeria-lux.com
SOA:Serial: 2023100507, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:102ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using classic web technologies including jQuery and jQuery ColorBox for UI elements. It lacks modern frameworks or CMS platforms, indicating a custom or legacy build. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization detected. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present but no structured JSON-LD. Accessibility features are minimal. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the data. The site uses HTTPS but does not implement advanced security headers. There is room for modernization and technical improvements to enhance security, performance, and compliance.
Analyze Another Website