Skip to main content

Is voepe.at a Scam? Security Check Results - VÖPE Reviews

voepe.at favicon

Is voepe.at Safe? Security Analysis for VÖPE

Check if voepe.at is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateAustriamedium
WordPressElementorjQueryPHP
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 1:43:05 PM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

VÖPE is a prominent Austrian industry association representing project developers in the real estate sector. The organization focuses on advocacy, expertise in construction and real estate law, and providing a platform for its members through events and publications. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on WordPress with Elementor, offering a professional and content-rich experience targeted at industry professionals and policymakers in Austria. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms in place, although incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not explicitly provided. Overall, the site demonstrates good compliance with GDPR and privacy standards, supporting trust and credibility in its sector.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorjQueryPHP

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The organization holds a leading position in the Austrian real estate development market, serving as a collective voice and competence center. Its business model revolves around member services, advocacy, and knowledge dissemination. The presence of a subsidiary or related project (VÖPE Next) indicates strategic growth and diversification. The website's content and structure support engagement with stakeholders, including policymakers and industry partners. Marketing and analytics tools are used responsibly, with clear privacy policies and cookie consent. The partnership with ÖPAV and other entities strengthens its ecosystem and influence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with excellent SSL configuration and implements key security headers to protect against common web vulnerabilities. Cookie consent is actively managed, and no sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of explicit incident response contacts and a vulnerability disclosure policy suggests room for improvement in security transparency and readiness. The security score is high, reflecting a mature security posture suitable for an industry association handling member and visitor data.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish explicit incident response and abuse contact information to improve security transparency.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

VÖPE

Description:

VÖPE is the joint voice of Austrian project developers, creating living spaces and serving as a competence center for construction, housing, and real estate law.

Key Services:
AdvocacyExpertise in construction and real estate lawEvents and member services
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorjQueryPHP
Frameworks:
Elementor
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Newsletter2GoBorlabs Cookie
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and content-rich

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

80/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx a:spf.edis.at include:spf.nl2go.com include:spf.1tool.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 67 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:162.159.134.42
Name Servers:
ns1.edis.globalDNS only
ns2.edis.globalDNS only
MX Records:
10: voepe-at.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2019111993, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:97ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx a:spf.edis.at include:spf.nl2go.com include:spf.1tool.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor page builder, jQuery, and standard web technologies. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, particularly in mobile responsiveness and accessibility. SEO practices are good with proper meta tags and structured navigation. The technical stack is well-maintained with no outdated or vulnerable libraries detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and stable online presence for the organization.
Analyze Another Website