Skip to main content

Is vote.gov a Scam? Security Check Results - U.S. Election Assistance Commission Reviews

vote.gov favicon

Is vote.gov Safe? Security Analysis for U.S. Election Assistance Commission

Check if vote.gov is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentUnited Stateslarge
Drupal CMSjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerUS Web Design System (USWDS)
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 2:39:46 PM
68
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Vote.gov is the official voter registration website of the United States government, operated in partnership with the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. It provides comprehensive information and resources to help U.S. citizens register to vote and understand their voting rights. The site targets eligible voters across all states and territories, offering multilingual support and accessibility features to ensure inclusivity. Its market position is that of a trusted federal government portal, serving as a central hub for voter registration information.

Detected Technologies

Drupal CMSjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerUS Web Design System (USWDS)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website operates as a government service with no commercial intent, focusing on public service delivery. Its partnership with the U.S. Election Assistance Commission strengthens its legitimacy and reach. The business model is non-commercial, funded by government resources, and targets all eligible U.S. voters. The site demonstrates strong branding consistency and trust indicators typical of official government domains. Its ecosystem includes related government domains such as eac.gov, which provides additional policy and contact information.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The site enforces HTTPS and uses a secure .gov domain, which are strong security indicators. However, it lacks visible security headers and does not publish a dedicated security policy or incident response contacts. The use of Google Tag Manager without a cookie consent mechanism indicates moderate privacy compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with enhanced headers and transparency around security practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response contact information.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

U.S. Election Assistance Commission

Description:

Official voter registration website of the United States government providing information to make registration and voting easy.

Key Services:
Voter registration informationVoting guides for various demographicsLinks to state and territory voter registration portals
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Drupal CMSjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerUS Web Design System (USWDS)
Frameworks:
Drupal
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

excellent

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure .gov domain
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with consent mode disabled

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Official U.S. government voter registration portal

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 -all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@eac.gov
Forensic Reports:dmarc@eac.gov

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

90/100
Score

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:vote.gov
Issuer:GeoTrust EV RSA CA G2
Valid Until:7/19/2026 (316 days)
SANs:vote.gov, search.vote.gov

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DNS Records

A Records:104.20.38.146, 172.66.144.95
AAAA Records:2606:4700:10::6814:2692, 2606:4700:10::ac42:905f
Name Servers:
evangeline.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
noel.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2380947479, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:77ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Drupal CMS and leverages the U.S. Web Design System for consistent government styling and accessibility. It uses jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. The technical infrastructure is modern and appropriate for a government service, though improvements in security headers and privacy mechanisms are recommended.
Analyze Another Website