
Is vote.gov Safe? Security Analysis for U.S. Election Assistance Commission
Check if vote.gov is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

AI Summary
Vote.gov is the official voter registration website of the United States government, operated in partnership with the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. It provides comprehensive information and resources to help U.S. citizens register to vote and understand their voting rights. The site targets eligible voters across all states and territories, offering multilingual support and accessibility features to ensure inclusivity. Its market position is that of a trusted federal government portal, serving as a central hub for voter registration information.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The website operates as a government service with no commercial intent, focusing on public service delivery. Its partnership with the U.S. Election Assistance Commission strengthens its legitimacy and reach. The business model is non-commercial, funded by government resources, and targets all eligible U.S. voters. The site demonstrates strong branding consistency and trust indicators typical of official government domains. Its ecosystem includes related government domains such as eac.gov, which provides additional policy and contact information.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The site enforces HTTPS and uses a secure .gov domain, which are strong security indicators. However, it lacks visible security headers and does not publish a dedicated security policy or incident response contacts. The use of Google Tag Manager without a cookie consent mechanism indicates moderate privacy compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with enhanced headers and transparency around security practices.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response contact information.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
U.S. Election Assistance Commission
Official voter registration website of the United States government providing information to make registration and voting easy.
excellent
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
excellent
excellent
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Secure .gov domain
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of Google Tag Manager with consent mode disabled
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Official U.S. government voter registration portal
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Weak Referrer-Policy configuration
LOWCurrent value: "same-origin"
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Certificate Details
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings