Skip to main content

Is vpalv.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Victim Protection Association Reviews

vpalv.com favicon

Is vpalv.com Safe? Security Analysis for Victim Protection Association

Check if vpalv.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitLatviasmall
WordPressPHPjQueryGoogle AnalyticsFacebook Pixel+1 more
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 9:37:14 PM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The Victim Protection Association (VPA) is a Latvian non-profit organization founded in 2018, dedicated to assisting victims of traffic accidents and other incidents in obtaining appropriate insurance compensation for material and moral damages. The website serves as an informational and contact platform, providing legal and psychological support services to victims and collaborating with businesses to ensure employee assistance. The organization positions itself as a specialized advocate for victims, with a clear focus on insurance claims and victim rights within Latvia and abroad. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using popular plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder and Revolution Slider. It employs standard web technologies including jQuery and integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with a moderate performance profile and good SEO practices. However, some security best practices like DNSSEC and security headers are missing, and there is no cookie consent mechanism despite GDPR policy presence. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are present. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, the site demonstrates a moderate security posture with room for improvement in compliance and technical safeguards. The overall risk assessment is moderate with no critical issues detected. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, implementing security headers, adding a cookie consent mechanism, and maintaining regular updates to plugins and WordPress core to enhance security and compliance.

Detected Technologies

WordPressPHPjQueryGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelSnazzy Maps

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

VPA operates in the non-profit sector focusing on victim protection and insurance claim assistance. Its market positioning is niche and specialized, targeting individuals affected by traffic accidents and related incidents, as well as businesses seeking to support their employees. The business model revolves around providing legal representation, consultation, and support services without commercial sales. Revenue streams are likely based on donations, grants, or service fees. The organization maintains partnerships with social and legal entities, as evidenced by partner logos and social media presence. Growth indicators include active content updates and multimedia testimonials. The partnership ecosystem includes social services and legal associations, enhancing credibility and outreach.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@vpalv.com

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712000****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML content. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which limits transparency in security management. The use of common tracking tools like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel introduces moderate user tracking. GDPR compliance is partially addressed with a privacy policy but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could benefit from enhanced technical controls and documented policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Victim Protection Association

Description:

Cietušo aizsardzības biedrība “VPA” ir dibināta 2018. gada 23. maijā, apvienojoties domubiedriem, kuri savā profesionālajā darbībā ir guvuši lielu pieredzi, risinot jautājumus, kas saistīti ar palīdzību nelaimes gadījumos cietušajām personām, kā arī ar šo personu bojātajām mantām un īpašumiem. Mēs strādājam, lai ceļu satiksmes negadījumā cietušie saņemtu atbilstošu apdrošināšanas atlīdzību par radītajiem zaudējumiem un morālajām ciešanām.

Key Services:
legal representationinsurance claim assistancepsychological supportconsultations for victims and businesses
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressPHPjQueryGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelSnazzy Maps
Frameworks:
WPBakery Page BuilderRevolution Slider
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Analytics opt-out mechanism

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsFacebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Google Analytics by MonsterInsightsFacebook PixelJivoChat
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional non-profit association site focused on victim protection and insurance claims.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.68.197 ip4:85.31.97.26 a mx ip4:91.203.68.160/27 -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 32 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
7 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(297 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.68.197
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lv
ns2.nano.lv
MX Records:
0: vpalv.com
SOA:Serial: 2025060400, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:101ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.68.197 ip4:85.31.97.26 a mx ip4:91.203.68.160/27 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with WPBakery Page Builder and Revolution Slider plugins, indicating a standard modern web infrastructure. It uses jQuery and integrates third-party services such as Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and JivoChat for live support. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for SEO with Yoast SEO plugin. Performance is moderate, with some custom CSS and JavaScript for UI enhancements. No advanced hosting or CDN details are evident. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers suggests some technical debt in security hardening. Overall, the infrastructure is typical for a small non-profit organization with opportunities for modernization and security improvements.
Analyze Another Website