Skip to main content

Is vpc.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - The Higher Education and Science Information Technology Shared Service Centre (VPC) Reviews

vpc.lv favicon

Is vpc.lv Safe? Security Analysis for The Higher Education and Science Information Technology Shared Service Centre (VPC)

Check if vpc.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationLatviamedium
WordPress 6.8.2LayerSlider plugin 7.14.4jQuery 3.7.1CookieYes consent management
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 2:19:17 AM
67
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website vpc.lv represents The Higher Education and Science Information Technology Shared Service Centre (VPC), a collaborative initiative by Latvia's four largest universities to advance digitalization and IT services in the education sector. The platform offers key academic IT services such as eduGAIN, eduroam, Dataverse, TLS/SSL certificates, and ORCID integration, targeting the Latvian academic and research community. The site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and includes a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, reflecting a commitment to privacy compliance. Technically, the site is moderately optimized with good mobile responsiveness and basic SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers and explicit security policies are absent. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain registration insights, but the website's content and affiliations strongly indicate legitimacy. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and focused on serving the educational IT needs of Latvia's academic institutions.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2LayerSlider plugin 7.14.4jQuery 3.7.1CookieYes consent management

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

VPC operates as a shared IT service center for higher education and research institutions in Latvia, leveraging the combined expertise of four major universities. Its business model centers on providing secure, scalable digital infrastructure and services tailored to academic needs, including federated identity management, secure WiFi access, data repository management, and certificate services. The organization positions itself as a key enabler of digital transformation in Latvian education, fostering collaboration and innovation. The website reflects a medium-sized entity with a clear focus on education technology. While direct revenue streams are not detailed, the partnership model and service offerings suggest funding through institutional collaboration and possibly government or EU grants. The absence of explicit contact or business registration details on the site suggests a focus on institutional rather than public commercial engagement.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@vpc.lv

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism that allows users to customize preferences, indicating GDPR awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks published security policies, incident response procedures, or vulnerability disclosure information, which are important for transparency and trust in the academic IT sector. Overall, the security measures appear adequate for the site's purpose but could be enhanced by formalizing and publishing security governance documents and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page linked prominently on the website.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

The Higher Education and Science Information Technology Shared Service Centre (VPC)

Description:

The Higher Education and Science Information Technology Shared Service Centre, or VPC, was established by Latvia’s four largest universities RTU, RSU, LU, and LBTU to drive forward the digitalization and advancement of Latvia’s education system. VPC’s mission is to leverage the expertise of these institutions to boost digital competencies and foster sustainable development within education.

Key Services:
eduGAIN federation serviceseduroam WiFi accessDataverse data repositoryTLS/SSL certificate servicesORCID researcher identification
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2LayerSlider plugin 7.14.4jQuery 3.7.1CookieYes consent management
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with customization and rejection options
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
CookieYes consent management
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based portal for an educational IT shared service center in Latvia.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=86400;"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

47/100
Score

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

4 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:31.24.196.226
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
1: vpc-lv.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1753351123, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:64ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with the LayerSlider plugin and jQuery 3.7.1, indicating a modern and widely supported technology stack. CookieYes is used for cookie consent management, reflecting compliance efforts. The site uses responsive design techniques and loads fonts from Adobe Typekit and Google Fonts. Performance appears moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading, but no advanced performance optimization tools or CDNs were detected. SEO metadata is present but could be expanded for better search engine visibility. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation support. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO, accessibility, and security header configurations.
Analyze Another Website