Skip to main content

Is w3apps.co a Scam? Security Check Results - w3apps.co Reviews

W

Is w3apps.co Safe? Security Analysis for 403 - Forbidden: Access is denied.

Check if w3apps.co is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherUnited Statessmall
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 2:14:06 AM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website w3apps.co is currently inaccessible, presenting a 403 Forbidden error page that denies access to any content. Due to this, no business information, metadata, or user-facing content is available for analysis. The domain is registered through GoDaddy.com, LLC with privacy protection via Domains By Proxy, LLC, which obscures registrant details. The domain was created in 2015 and is set to expire in early 2026, indicating a moderate domain age but no visible business presence. Technically, the site lacks DNSSEC and security headers, and no HTTPS status was provided, suggesting basic security posture. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are published, and no contact or social media information is available. Overall, the site appears inactive or restricted, limiting any meaningful security, compliance, or business analysis.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of accessible content and business information, no insights into market positioning, business model, or services can be derived. The domain's privacy-protected WHOIS and lack of public data reduce transparency and trust. The hosting provider is GoDaddy, a common registrar and host, but no further infrastructure or partnership data is available. Without content or contact details, the website does not currently present itself as an active business entity.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is minimal with no evidence of HTTPS enforcement, security headers, or DNSSEC. The 403 Forbidden error indicates access restrictions but does not clarify if this is due to misconfiguration or intentional blocking. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps. Overall, the site has a low security maturity level and requires significant improvements to meet standard security and privacy best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and verify proper configuration.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Website returns a 403 Forbidden error page indicating access is denied. No WAF vendor branding detected but content is blocked.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to 403 Forbidden error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.createsend.com include:mailgun.org include:spf.mandrillapp.com ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
10 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(143 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:34.204.104.180
Name Servers:
ns09.domaincontrol.com
ns10.domaincontrol.com
MX Records:
10: mxa.mailgun.org
10: mxb.mailgun.org
SOA:Serial: 2025070800, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:69ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.createsend.com include:mailgun.org include:spf.mandrillapp.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves a minimal HTML page with a 403 Forbidden status, indicating restricted access. No scripts, frameworks, or CMS are detected. The domain uses GoDaddy name servers and registrar services. DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers are present in the provided data. The site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features. Performance and SEO cannot be assessed due to lack of content. The technical infrastructure appears basic and possibly misconfigured or intentionally restricted.
Analyze Another Website