Skip to main content

Is walla.my a Scam? Security Check Results - Qinetics Solutions Sdn Bhd Reviews

walla.my favicon

Is walla.my Safe? Security Analysis for Qinetics Solutions Sdn Bhd

Check if walla.my is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyMalaysiasmall
Google Tag ManagerFacebook PixelGoogle AnalyticsFramer (website generator)Google Fonts
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 1:48:42 PM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Walla is a free and safe online form builder service operated by Qinetics Solutions Sdn Bhd, a Malaysian company established in 2022. The website offers users the ability to create beautiful forms, collaborate in real-time, and keep data secure without limits or hassle. The service targets a general audience seeking easy-to-use form building tools. Technically, the website is built using the Framer platform and integrates Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel for marketing and analytics purposes. The site is mobile-optimized and has good SEO practices but lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing important security headers and policies. The domain registration is consistent with the business entity and country, indicating legitimacy. Overall, the website is professional and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy disclosures and security practices.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerFacebook PixelGoogle AnalyticsFramer (website generator)Google Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the technology sector, specifically providing SaaS form building solutions. The business model appears to be freemium or free service-based, focusing on ease of use and data safety. The market position is not explicitly stated but targets users needing form creation and collaboration tools. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The company is relatively new, founded in 2022, and based in Malaysia. The website content is consistent and professionally branded, though trust indicators like certifications or testimonials are absent. The use of major marketing and analytics tools suggests an intent to grow and engage users effectively.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

c*****@walla.myEnterprise
a*****@walla.my

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks DNSSEC and important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, indicating limited transparency in security governance. Tracking technologies are used extensively without visible privacy compliance mechanisms, which may raise GDPR and other regulatory concerns. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The security score is moderate but can be improved by implementing recommended headers and policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms to improve privacy compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Qinetics Solutions Sdn Bhd

Description:

Create beautiful forms, collaborate in real-time, and keep your data safe. No limits. No hassle. All for FREE.

Key Services:
form buildingreal-time collaborationdata safety
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerFacebook PixelGoogle AnalyticsFramer (website generator)Google Fonts
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a form builder service branded as 'Walla'.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:aspmx.googlemail.com include:_spf.google.com include:mail.stibee.com ~all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 80 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:199.36.158.100
Name Servers:
ns1.whoisdomain.krDNS only
ns2.whoisdomain.krDNS only
ns3.whoisdomain.krDNS only
ns4.whoisdomain.krDNS only
MX Records:
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2022033101, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:320ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:aspmx.googlemail.com include:_spf.google.com include:mail.stibee.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Framer platform, leveraging modern web technologies and fonts from Google Fonts. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel for marketing and analytics. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts. No CMS other than Framer is detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit but likely tied to Framer's infrastructure. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but meets basic standards. Technical debt appears low, but security enhancements are recommended.
Analyze Another Website