
Is walletconnect.network Safe? Security Analysis for WalletConnect Foundation
Check if walletconnect.network is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
WalletConnect Foundation operates a leading decentralized connectivity layer for the blockchain and crypto ecosystem, enabling seamless wallet connections across multiple chains and projects. The platform supports over 47.5 million users and integrates with hundreds of wallets and thousands of applications, positioning itself as a critical infrastructure provider in the financial internet space. Their native token, WCT, secures the network through staking, governance, and rewards, reflecting a robust decentralized business model. Technically, the website is built on a modern React-based framework (Next.js) with a well-structured content management system (Sanity.io). The site demonstrates excellent mobile optimization, fast performance, and good SEO practices. Integration of Google Tag Manager and Termly resource blocker indicates a mature approach to analytics and privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs resource blocking for privacy. However, explicit security headers and a public security policy or incident response contacts are not evident, representing areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, the website and domain exhibit high legitimacy and professionalism, with a strong ecosystem presence and consistent branding. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers is typical for decentralized infrastructure projects but may impact direct user support visibility. Strategic recommendations include publishing detailed security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure programs to enhance trust and compliance.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
WalletConnect Foundation holds a dominant market position as the connectivity layer for blockchain wallets, serving a large user base and extensive ecosystem partners. Their business model leverages decentralized infrastructure with token-based network security and governance. Revenue streams likely include staking fees, partnerships, and ecosystem services. The target customers are blockchain developers, wallet providers, and crypto users. Growth indicators include active ecosystem expansion, governance voting platforms, and continuous product updates. The partnership ecosystem is broad, including staking, governance, and wallet directory services, reinforcing their strategic market presence.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The current security maturity is good, with HTTPS enforced and privacy-focused resource blocking. The absence of explicit security headers and published security policies limits transparency and may expose the organization to risks. No visible vulnerabilities or sensitive data leaks were found. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure are not publicly documented, which could delay response to security incidents. Enhancing these areas would improve the overall security culture and risk management.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
WalletConnect Foundation
The WalletConnect Network is the onchain UX ecosystem powering 300 million connections for over 47.5 million users across 600 wallets, 67K projects, and all chains. It provides essential decentralized infrastructure moving billions in value annually, powered by 20+ world-class node operators, 700+ wallets, 70K+ apps, and millions of users.
excellent
consistent
Technical Stack
fast
excellent
good
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of resource blocking for privacy (Termly)
- No visible vulnerable libraries
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 31 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Certificate Details
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings