Skip to main content

Is wallpaper.monster a Scam? Security Check Results - Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf Reviews

wallpaper.monster favicon

Is wallpaper.monster Safe? Security Analysis for Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf

Check if wallpaper.monster is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherIcelandsmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle AdsenseBodis domain parking
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 1:17:28 AM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website wallpaper.monster is currently a domain parking page primarily serving advertisements and related search content. It does not present any active business operations, products, or services. The domain is newly registered in July 2024 and uses privacy protection services, indicating it is likely held for future development or resale. The technical infrastructure is basic, relying on standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with integration of Google Adsense and Bodis domain parking services. The site is accessible without any WAF or security challenges but lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site has a minimal posture with HTTPS enabled but no DNSSEC or security policies visible. Overall, the site scores low on business credibility and privacy compliance due to lack of contact information and minimal content.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle AdsenseBodis domain parking

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The domain wallpaper.monster does not currently operate as an active business entity. The registrant uses privacy protection, and the site content is limited to advertising and domain parking placeholders. There is no evidence of a business model beyond monetizing traffic through ads. The target audience is general internet users who may visit the domain by chance. No partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies are identified. The domain age and privacy protection suggest speculative registration rather than an established market presence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is low with only basic HTTPS encryption in place. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options increases risk exposure. No incident response or security policies are published. The site does not collect user data via forms, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement. Privacy compliance is minimal with a privacy policy page present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the security posture is insufficient for a business website but typical for a parked domain.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to improve domain security and trustworthiness.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf

Description:

Website appears to be a domain parking or placeholder site with ads and related search content for wallpaper.monster

Key Services:
Domain parkingAdvertising
Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle AdsenseBodis domain parking
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
45/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdsenseBodis
Tracking Pixels:
Google Adsense cookie.js
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is a domain parking page with ads and related search iframe

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

35/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DMARC record found

HIGH

DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

No MX records found

MEDIUM

Domain cannot receive email without MX records

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 65 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

55/100
Score

No MX Records

LOW

Domain cannot receive email without MX records

No Name Servers Found

HIGH

Unable to find name servers for domain

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(323 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:199.59.243.228
Name Servers:
dns101.registrar-servers.comWHOIS only
dns102.registrar-servers.comWHOIS only

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:46ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a simple technology stack with static HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. It integrates Google Adsense and Bodis for advertising and domain monetization. The site is hosted via Porkbun/Bodis domain parking services. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO optimization is minimal with only basic meta tags. There is no CMS detected, and no modern web frameworks are used. The site would benefit from modernization and improved technical SEO and accessibility.
Analyze Another Website