Skip to main content

Is waltonisaacson.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Walton Isaacson Reviews

waltonisaacson.com favicon

Is waltonisaacson.com Safe? Security Analysis for Walton Isaacson

Check if waltonisaacson.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaN/amedium
WordPress 5.1.19jQuery 1.12.4Swiper.jsContact Form 7 pluginCustom Twitter Feeds plugin
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 1:48:09 AM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Walton Isaacson is a medium-sized, culture-driven marketing and advertising agency founded in 2005, specializing in diverse market segments such as Gen Z, Hispanic, Black, LGBTQ, and women. The company offers a broad range of services including advertising, experiential marketing, brand identity, social media, and influencer relations. Their market position is that of a purpose-driven innovator focused on cultural insights to drive brand success. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common plugins and libraries like jQuery and Swiper.js, showing moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced but lacks important security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy practices.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 5.1.19jQuery 1.12.4Swiper.jsContact Form 7 pluginCustom Twitter Feeds plugin

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company targets brands seeking culturally relevant marketing strategies, leveraging insights and culture to unlock barriers for products and brands. Their leadership team is publicly visible with LinkedIn profiles, and they maintain affiliations with reputable industry organizations, enhancing credibility. The business model is full-service agency work with a focus on multicultural segments, positioning them well in a competitive media landscape. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a concern but does not negate the visible business presence. No direct revenue streams or parent/subsidiary relationships are evident from the website content.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

S*****@waltonisaacson.com
H*****@waltonisaacson.com

Phone Numbers (4)

323*******
312*******
646*******
469*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a critical security baseline. However, it lacks common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS, which could expose it to clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and other attacks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. The site uses standard WordPress plugins, which if not regularly updated, could pose vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or credentials were detected. Incident response contacts or security policies are not published, indicating a potential gap in security governance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Walton Isaacson

Description:

Walton Isaacson is a culture-driven advertising and marketing agency focused on diverse market segments including General Market, Gen Z, DE&I, Hispanic, Millennial, Black, LGBTQ, and Women. They offer services such as advertising, experiential marketing, promotions, creative content development, brand identity, entertainment & sports marketing, strategic planning, social media, influencer relations, media planning & buying, product development, and original programming.

Key Services:
AdvertisingExperientialPromotionsCreative Content DevelopmentBrand IdentityEntertainment & SportsStrategic PlanningSocial MediaInfluencer RelationsMedia Planning & Buying
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 5.1.19jQuery 1.12.4Swiper.jsContact Form 7 pluginCustom Twitter Feeds plugin
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Contact Form 7Custom Twitter Feeds
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx include:emaileuc.freshservice.com include:sendgrid.net include:_netblocks.mimecast.com include:email.freshdesk.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.emailsignatures365.com include:servers.mcsv.net ip4:167.89.11.197 -all
DNS Lookups:8/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 41 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:67.227.154.47
Name Servers:
ns1.mediatemple.netDNS only
ns2.mediatemple.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: us-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com
10: us-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.com
SOA:Serial: 2024112202, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:64ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx include:emaileuc.freshservice.com include:sendgrid.net include:_netblocks.mimecast.com include:email.freshdesk.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.emailsignatures365.com include:servers.mcsv.net ip4:167.89.11.197 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 5.1.19, using jQuery 1.12.4 and Swiper.js for UI components. Contact Form 7 and Custom Twitter Feeds plugins are used for forms and social media integration. The site loads external scripts from trusted CDNs and uses HTTPS. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness. SEO optimization is basic with canonical and shortlink tags present but no advanced metadata or structured data. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA roles but could be improved. No advanced frameworks or hosting provider details are evident from the content.
Analyze Another Website