Is wam.studio Safe? Security Analysis for Warren and Mahoney
Check if wam.studio is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Warren and Mahoney is a well-established architecture practice operating primarily in Australia and New Zealand, employing approximately 350 professionals from 35 countries. The firm focuses on multidisciplinary architectural design, masterplanning, urban and sustainable design, positioning itself as an innovative leader in the architecture industry. Their website reflects a high level of professionalism with excellent design quality, clear navigation, and mobile optimization. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks such as Astro and a headless CMS (Strapi), with Google Tag Manager integrated for analytics. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, though some security headers are missing and no explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are found. Privacy compliance is good with a comprehensive privacy policy, but lacks a cookie consent mechanism. WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common but reduces transparency slightly. Overall, the website and business present a trustworthy and professional image with room for minor security and compliance improvements.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The company is positioned as a large, essential entity in the real estate sector, specializing in architecture and design services. Their market position is strong, highlighted by industry recognition such as being named one of the world’s most innovative architectural firms. The business model revolves around providing architectural and urban design services to clients in Australia and New Zealand. The website targets clients seeking high-quality architectural solutions and emphasizes collaboration and sustainability. The firm maintains active social media channels on Instagram and LinkedIn, supporting brand visibility and client engagement. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are publicly listed on the homepage, suggesting contact details may be on dedicated pages. The lack of detailed WHOIS registrant information is a minor transparency concern but not unusual for professional services.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. However, it lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in security governance and transparency. The integration of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, which is managed with a privacy policy but without a visible cookie consent banner, potentially impacting GDPR compliance. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by implementing additional headers, explicit security policies, and cookie consent mechanisms.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Warren and Mahoney
We are an architecture practice based in Australia and New Zealand with approximately 350 highly engaged people from 35 countries, all eager to explore how design can meet the needs of a rapidly changing world.
excellent
consistent
Technical Stack
fast
excellent
good
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: energy, transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
Complex SPF record
LOWToo many include statements can cause lookup limits
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 86 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Certificate Details
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings