Skip to main content

Is warpcast.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Farcaster Reviews

warpcast.com favicon

Is warpcast.com Safe? Security Analysis for Farcaster

Check if warpcast.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
JavaScriptReact (implied by JSX and module scripts)Google Fonts (Inter)Manifest for PWA
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 5:28:40 AM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Farcaster is a decentralized social network platform targeting communities such as developers, artists, NFT collectors, and meme creators. It offers mobile applications for iOS and Android, positioning itself as a niche player in the decentralized social networking space. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear calls to action for sign-up and app downloads. The technical infrastructure is modern, leveraging React and progressive web app features, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security best practices like security headers and incident response policies are not explicitly documented. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy and terms of use present but lacking a cookie consent mechanism and detailed GDPR compliance indicators. Overall, the site is safe, trustworthy, and well-designed, but could improve transparency and compliance aspects.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptReact (implied by JSX and module scripts)Google Fonts (Inter)Manifest for PWA

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Farcaster operates in the technology sector as a decentralized social network, focusing on community engagement for niche audiences such as coders and NFT collectors. Its business model revolves around providing a platform and mobile apps to facilitate decentralized social interactions. The company maintains a professional online presence with official app store links and developer documentation, indicating a focus on developer and tech-savvy users. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is typical for startups and projects in this space. No direct contact information or detailed business registration data is available, which is common for decentralized projects. The platform's growth potential lies in its unique decentralized approach and community focus, though transparency and compliance improvements could enhance trust and adoption.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and does not provide a published security policy or incident response contact information. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and vulnerability disclosure policy indicates gaps in privacy and security compliance. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party tracking scripts introduces moderate user tracking, which should be balanced with privacy compliance measures. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for a technology startup but with room for improvement in formal policies and headers.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Farcaster

Description:

A decentralized social network connecting communities such as coders, artists, NFT collectors, and meme creators.

Key Services:
Decentralized social networkingMobile applications for iOS and AndroidCommunity engagement platform
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptReact (implied by JSX and module scripts)Google Fonts (Inter)Manifest for PWA
Frameworks:
React
Platforms:
WebiOSAndroid
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
pencil-novel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
pencil-novel
Marketing Tools:
pencil-novel
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15552000; includeSubDomains; preload"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:amazonses.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Subdomain Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:3588e368d5884ffb8ba9388b96e52802@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.net
Forensic Reports:85C194@dmarcmntr.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

65/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 9 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:farcaster.xyz
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:9/15/2025 (9 days)
SANs:farcaster.xyz, *.farcaster.xyz

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
4 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(205 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.18.42.135, 172.64.145.121
AAAA Records:2606:4700:4407::ac40:9179, 2606:4700:4401::6812:2a87
Name Servers:
brian.ns.cloudflare.com
lola.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: inbound-smtp.us-east-1.amazonaws.com
SOA:Serial: 2382223633, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:136ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:amazonses.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack, likely React, with module-based scripts and CSS. It includes Google Fonts for typography and a manifest file indicating progressive web app capabilities. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design and app download links for iOS and Android. Performance is moderate, with multiple modulepreload scripts which may impact initial load times. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is basic with meta description and viewport tags but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data detected. The site uses a third-party analytics script (pencil-novel) which tracks user interactions. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO and accessibility improvements.
Analyze Another Website