Skip to main content

Is weather.com a Scam? Security Check Results - The Weather Channel Reviews

weather.com favicon

Is weather.com Safe? Security Analysis for The Weather Channel

Check if weather.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaUnited Statesenterprise
JavaScriptNew Relic monitoringAkamai CDNPrebid.js for advertisingPrivacy Management scripts
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 7:45:04 PM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Weather Channel operates weather.com, a leading platform providing national and local weather forecasts, radar imagery, hurricane coverage, and weather reports. Established in 1994, the company has a strong market presence in the media industry focused on weather information. The website targets a general audience seeking reliable weather data and related news. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks, integrates with multiple analytics and advertising services, and is hosted via Akamai CDN, ensuring moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security-wise, HTTPS is enabled, but there is room for improvement in security headers and public security policies. Privacy compliance is basic, with no explicit privacy or cookie policies detected in the provided content. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and content-rich, but could enhance transparency and security posture.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptNew Relic monitoringAkamai CDNPrebid.js for advertisingPrivacy Management scripts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The Weather Channel holds a strong market position as a trusted weather information provider in the United States. Its business model revolves around content delivery supported by advertising revenue. The company leverages partnerships with major ad networks and analytics providers to monetize its platform. The target customers are general consumers interested in weather updates. The company benefits from a well-established brand and extensive social media presence. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified from the data. The business operates at an enterprise scale with a mature digital infrastructure.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain registration protections in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options indicate potential areas for enhancement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The site lacks publicly available security policies or incident response contacts, which could improve transparency and readiness. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing security audits to mitigate supply chain risks.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

The Weather Channel

Description:

The Weather Channel and weather.com provide a national and local weather forecast for cities, as well as weather radar, report and hurricane coverage

Key Services:
national and local weather forecastsweather radarhurricane coverageweather reports
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptNew Relic monitoringAkamai CDNPrebid.js for advertisingPrivacy Management scripts
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
New RelicAppsFlyer
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdSenseConfiant
Tracking Pixels:
New RelicAppsFlyerPrivacy Management
Marketing Tools:
AppsFlyer
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content about weather forecasts and radar.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15552000; preload"

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

70/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

55/100
Score

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:96.8.80.136 ip4:96.8.80.135 ip4:96.8.82.135 ip4:96.8.84.135 ip4:96.8.88.240 ip4:208.106.251.89 ip4:65.212.71.11 ip4:96.8.93.78 ip4:96.8.93.79 ip4:96.8.92.25 ip4:185.57.95.81 ip4:54.208.146.123 ip4:52.90.110.211 ip4:54.174.191.95 a:zgateway.zuor a.com include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com include:mktomail.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:apexportal.nbcuni.com ~all
DNS Lookups:7/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@weather.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:92.123.205.207
AAAA Records:2a02:26f0:41:6a2::2e03, 2a02:26f0:41:69f::2e03
Name Servers:
a1-70.akam.netDNS only
a10-65.akam.netDNS only
a11-66.akam.netDNS only
a13-67.akam.netDNS only
a14-64.akam.netDNS only
a24-65.akam.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 1648491755, TTL: 60s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:81ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:96.8.80.136 ip4:96.8.80.135 ip4:96.8.82.135 ip4:96.8.84.135 ip4:96.8.88.240 ip4:208.106.251.89 ip4:65.212.71.11 ip4:96.8.93.78 ip4:96.8.93.79 ip4:96.8.92.25 ip4:185.57.95.81 ip4:54.208.146.123 ip4:52.90.110.211 ip4:54.174.191.95 a:zgateway.zuor a.com include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com include:mktomail.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:apexportal.nbcuni.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based tech stack with integrations for performance monitoring (New Relic), advertising (Google AdSense, Confiant), and privacy management. Hosting is via Akamai CDN, providing global content delivery capabilities. The site shows good mobile optimization and SEO practices with proper meta tags and structured data. Accessibility features are basic but present. Performance is moderate, with some preloading of scripts and fonts. There is no detected CMS from the provided data. The technical infrastructure supports a high-traffic enterprise website but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Analyze Another Website