Skip to main content

Is web-repository.com a Scam? Security Check Results - web-repository.com Reviews

W

Is web-repository.com Safe? Security Analysis for Academy Dashboard

Check if web-repository.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationN/asmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptWistia video embedsSentry (error tracking)+2 more
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 12:19:37 PM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website web-repository.com is an educational platform providing video tutorials focused on website creation, e-commerce, funnel building, email marketing, and quizzes. It targets individuals and businesses seeking to learn digital marketing and web development skills through structured video series. The platform uses Wistia for video hosting and integrates Sentry for error tracking, indicating a moderate level of technical maturity. The site is hosted on HTTPS with a domain registered since 2017, supporting its legitimacy. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, lack of contact information, and missing security headers highlight areas for improvement in compliance and security posture. Overall, the website presents a professional educational offering but requires enhancements in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptWistia video embedsSentry (error tracking)FontAwesomeGoogle Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the education and technology sectors, delivering online video-based learning content. Its business model revolves around providing free or paid educational video series to a niche audience interested in web design and digital marketing. The domain age and registration details align with a stable small business. The lack of visible contact details and certifications may limit trust and growth potential. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. The platform's use of modern video hosting and error tracking tools suggests a focus on user experience and operational reliability.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and has domain transfer protections in place, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth. No forms or input fields were detected, minimizing attack surface, but also indicating limited user interaction points. The lack of privacy and cookie policies suggests non-compliance with GDPR and similar regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not present, which could hinder timely security issue management. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard security headers and compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR and global privacy compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

The website offers educational video series and tutorials focused on website creation, e-commerce, funnels, email marketing, quizzes, and surveys. It provides structured learning content with multiple video series aimed at teaching users how to build websites, create funnels, and manage email marketing campaigns.

Key Services:
Website creation tutorialsE-commerce tutorialsFunnel building tutorialsEmail marketing tutorialsQuizzes and surveys tutorials
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptWistia video embedsSentry (error tracking)FontAwesomeGoogle Fonts
Platforms:
Wistia video platform
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Sentry
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Sentry
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website offers multiple educational video series on web design, e-commerce, funnels, and email marketing.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:amazonses.com include:zoho.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:admin@web-repository.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 61 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
7 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(99 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:34.202.63.170
Name Servers:
ns1.web-repository.com
ns2.web-repository.com
ns3.web-repository.com
ns4.web-repository.com
MX Records:
10: mx.zoho.com
20: mx2.zoho.com
50: mx3.zoho.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:70ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:amazonses.com include:zoho.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a custom or proprietary platform with modern front-end technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. Video content is hosted on Wistia, a professional video platform, ensuring reliable streaming. Sentry is integrated for error monitoring, indicating proactive operational management. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses Google Fonts and FontAwesome for styling and icons. Performance appears moderate with preloading and preconnect hints. However, no common CMS or frameworks were detected, which may imply custom development. The lack of security headers and privacy compliance features are technical gaps. Hosting provider details are limited to domain registrar information. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for the site's educational purpose but can be enhanced for security and compliance.
Analyze Another Website