Skip to main content

Is webdesign-nordland.no a Scam? Security Check Results - Webdesign Nordland Reviews

webdesign-nordland.no favicon

Is webdesign-nordland.no Safe? Security Analysis for Webdesign Nordland

Check if webdesign-nordland.no is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyNorwaysmall
JavaScriptjQuery (custom implementation)Facebook PixelGoogle Fonts
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 11:54:30 PM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Webdesign Nordland is a small Norwegian technology service provider specializing in web design and search engine optimization, operating primarily in the Mo i Rana region of Nordland. The company was founded in 2020 and operates under the parent company Din Framvekst AS. Their website is professionally designed using WordPress with the Divi theme, featuring modern tracking technologies such as Facebook Pixel. Contact information including email, phone, and physical address is clearly presented, supporting business credibility. However, the website lacks explicit privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which impacts compliance and trust. Technically, the website employs a modern CMS and frameworks but shows moderate performance and basic accessibility features. Security posture is average with HTTPS implied but no visible security headers or incident response information. The WHOIS data presents a suspicious future domain creation date inconsistent with the business founding year, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy. Overall, the website is safe, business-focused, and suitable for general audiences. The main risks relate to privacy compliance gaps and domain registration inconsistencies. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy policies, and WHOIS data accuracy would enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptjQuery (custom implementation)Facebook PixelGoogle Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Webdesign Nordland targets local small and medium businesses or individuals seeking web design and SEO services in the Nordland region. Their business model is service-oriented, focusing on digital presence enhancement. The company leverages a professional website and social media presence (Facebook) to reach customers. The parent company Din Framvekst AS suggests a structured business entity. The lack of certifications or formal security policies indicates a small-scale operation with room for maturity. The use of Facebook Pixel indicates marketing and retargeting efforts. Growth potential exists through improved compliance and security transparency.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@webdesign-nordland.no

Phone Numbers (1)

417*****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency in security management. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The suspicious WHOIS domain creation date undermines domain trustworthiness. Overall, security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements in policy transparency and technical safeguards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Webdesign Nordland

Description:

Webdesign Nordland ble etablert i 2020 og befinner seg i Mo i Rana. Vi tilbyr tjenester som webdesign og søkemotoroptimalisering, samt et bredt utvalg av

Key Services:
webdesignsøkemotoroptimalisering (SEO)
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptjQuery (custom implementation)Facebook PixelGoogle Fonts
Frameworks:
Divi ThemeWordPress
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS usage implied by canonical URL
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Facebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Facebook Pixel
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Cloudflare, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Subdomain Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 80 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:91.189.183.38
Name Servers:
ns1.awati.noDNS only
ns2.awati.noDNS only
MX Records:
0: webdesignnordland-no02c.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025072202, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:95ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Divi theme, a widely used and flexible platform. It includes JavaScript libraries and Facebook Pixel for marketing analytics. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile optimized with good SEO meta tags and structured data. However, no advanced performance optimization or accessibility features were detected. The technical stack is modern but basic, suitable for a small business. There is no explicit hosting provider information. The site would benefit from improved security configurations and performance tuning.
Analyze Another Website