Skip to main content

Is weblex.eu a Scam? Security Check Results - weblex.eu Reviews

weblex.eu favicon

Is weblex.eu Safe? Security Analysis for Maintenance

Check if weblex.eu is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

E-commerceN/asmall
BootstrapFont AwesomeGoogle FontsJournal3 ThemeOpenCart
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:25:52 PM
38
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website https://weblex.eu/ is currently in maintenance mode, displaying a placeholder page with minimal content and no active business information. The site appears to be an e-commerce platform built on OpenCart with the Journal3 theme, but no products or services are currently accessible. The lack of privacy, cookie, terms of service, and contact information indicates the site is either under development or temporarily offline. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies such as Bootstrap and Font Awesome, with Google Fonts for typography. However, no advanced security headers or policies are implemented, and no analytics or marketing tools are detected. The WHOIS data shows the domain is registered via a reputable registrar, Ascio Technologies Inc., but lacks detailed registrant information, which is common for many domains. Overall, the site has a low trust and security posture due to the absence of critical policies and content.

Detected Technologies

BootstrapFont AwesomeGoogle FontsJournal3 ThemeOpenCart

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the maintenance status, there is limited business intelligence available. The site targets e-commerce customers but currently does not provide any product or service information. The business model is likely retail or online sales, but no market positioning or competitive advantages can be assessed. No partnerships, certifications, or trust indicators are present. The lack of contact details and policies reduces credibility and customer trust. Growth indicators and strategic observations cannot be determined at this stage.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is weak, with no visible security headers, no incident response or security policies, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The site uses HTTPS (implied by base href https://), but SSL configuration details are unknown. No forms or inputs are present to evaluate secure handling of user data. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No security best practices are observed, and the site is vulnerable to trust issues from a security perspective.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

The website appears to be an e-commerce store currently in maintenance mode with no active content available.

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
BootstrapFont AwesomeGoogle FontsJournal3 ThemeOpenCart
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Platforms:
OpenCart
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is currently in maintenance mode with no active content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

0/100
Score
Analysis failed - content could not be retrieved

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.inbox.eu ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 75 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

DNS Records

A Records:168.119.3.225
Name Servers:
nina.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
rick.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.inbox.eu
SOA:Serial: 2378633055, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:130ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.inbox.eu ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on OpenCart CMS with the Journal3 theme, utilizing Bootstrap and Font Awesome for UI components and Google Fonts for typography. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. However, the site is currently in maintenance mode, limiting content availability and user interaction. Performance appears moderate but cannot be fully assessed due to lack of active content. SEO optimization is basic with canonical tags and Open Graph metadata present but no structured data or rich snippets detected. Accessibility features are minimal. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking scripts, indicating limited data collection or user behavior analysis.
Analyze Another Website