Skip to main content

Is weblocks.io a Scam? Security Check Results - weblocks.io Reviews

W

Is weblocks.io Safe? Security Analysis for 403 Forbidden

Check if weblocks.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherIcelandsmall
Apache/2.4.63Debian
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 11:14:10 AM
41
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website at weblocks.io is currently inaccessible, returning a 403 Forbidden error page which blocks any meaningful content or metadata analysis. The domain is registered through NameCheap with privacy protection enabled, registered in 2021, indicating a relatively new or small business presence. Due to the lack of accessible content, no business description, contact information, or security policies are available for review. The technical infrastructure appears to be hosted on an Apache 2.4.63 server running Debian, but no further technology stack details can be extracted. Security posture cannot be properly assessed without HTTPS or security headers information, and no compliance documentation is present. Overall, the site presents a high risk due to lack of transparency and accessibility.

Detected Technologies

Apache/2.4.63Debian

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No business intelligence can be derived from the website content as it is blocked. The domain registration data shows privacy protection and a recent creation date, which is common for new or small businesses but does not provide insight into market positioning, revenue streams, or partnerships. No external links or social media presence are visible to indicate ecosystem or customer engagement.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is currently poor due to the absence of HTTPS, security headers, and visible security policies. The 403 Forbidden response may indicate intentional access restrictions or misconfiguration. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found. The lack of transparency and security best practices increases risk exposure.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure communications.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Website returns a 403 Forbidden error page indicating access is blocked or restricted. No WAF vendor-specific challenge detected.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Apache/2.4.63Debian

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to 403 Forbidden error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 49 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
4 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(261 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:137.184.178.151
Name Servers:
dns1.registrar-servers.com
dns2.registrar-servers.com
MX Records:
10: eforward3.registrar-servers.com
20: eforward5.registrar-servers.com
15: eforward4.registrar-servers.com
10: eforward2.registrar-servers.com
10: eforward1.registrar-servers.com
SOA:Serial: 1689847231, TTL: 3601s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:64ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is hosted on an Apache 2.4.63 server running Debian, registered via NameCheap. No CMS or frameworks are detected due to blocked content. The site currently returns a 403 Forbidden error, indicating access restrictions or misconfiguration. No performance, SEO, or accessibility data can be assessed. The technical setup appears minimal and requires improvements to enable content delivery and security compliance.
Analyze Another Website