Skip to main content

Is webscand.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Scand SIA Reviews

S

Is webscand.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Scand SIA

Check if webscand.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyLatviasmall
WordPressKadence ThemeElementorjQuerySwiper.js
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:38:59 PM
32
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website webscand.lv represents a small personal web development portfolio for Natalie E. Watson, offering services such as UI/UX design, digital marketing, and web development. The site is built on WordPress using the Kadence theme and Elementor page builder, indicating a modern but template-based technical infrastructure. The content is largely placeholder text, suggesting the site may be in development or a demo. Social media links are present but not linked to actual profiles. Contact information is minimal and generic, with no company-specific email or phone numbers. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no advanced security headers are detected, though HTTPS is enabled. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is functional but lacks comprehensive privacy, security, and business credibility features.

Detected Technologies

WordPressKadence ThemeElementorjQuerySwiper.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business appears to be a small-scale personal web development studio based in Latvia, targeting clients seeking web design and development services. The business model is service-oriented, likely freelance or small agency. The site includes portfolio showcases and client testimonials as trust indicators. There is no evidence of partnerships, certifications, or advanced business information. The use of WordPress and popular plugins suggests a cost-effective approach to web presence. The lack of detailed contact info and policies may hinder client trust and compliance with regulations.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is basic. HTTPS is enabled, which is essential. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided. The site uses popular plugins and themes, which should be regularly updated to avoid vulnerabilities. No sensitive data exposure was detected in the content. Overall, the site is moderately secure but could benefit from improved security best practices and compliance measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Scand SIA

Description:

Personal portfolio website of a web developer named Natalie E. Watson offering UI/UX design, digital marketing, and web development services.

Key Services:
UI/UX DesignDigital MarketingWeb Development
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressKadence ThemeElementorjQuerySwiper.js
Frameworks:
Elementor
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Jetpack Stats
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Jetpack Stats (stats.wp.com)
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a personal portfolio for a web developer named Natalie E. Watson.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx a:webmail.garmtech.net a:web15.garmtech.net a:ns2.garmtech.com include:relay.mailchannels.net -all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:91.194.76.170
Name Servers:
ns1.garmtech.comDNS only
ns2.garmtech.comDNS only
ns3.garmtech.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.webscand.lv
20: mx2.garmtech.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with the Kadence theme and Elementor page builder, supported by jQuery and Swiper.js for UI components. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses Jetpack Stats for analytics. Performance is moderate with responsive design and basic accessibility features. SEO is basic with meta tags but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features. The hosting provider is not identified from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is standard for a small personal portfolio but could be improved with enhanced security and privacy features.
Analyze Another Website