Skip to main content

Is webtower.ch a Scam? Security Check Results - webtower.ch Reviews

W

Is webtower.ch Safe? Security Analysis for webtower.ch | COMING SOON...

https://webtower.ch

Check if webtower.ch is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherSwitzerlandsmall
Google Tag Managergtag.js
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 3:10:04 AM
41
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website webtower.ch currently serves as a minimal placeholder announcing a forthcoming new website. It provides basic contact information including an email address and a Swiss phone number but lacks any detailed business description, services, or branding elements. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics but does not present privacy or cookie policies, security policies, or terms of service. Technically, the site is simple with basic styling and no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. Security posture is weak due to absence of security headers and unknown SSL status. Overall, the site is low in content quality and business credibility, limiting trust and user engagement.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag Managergtag.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the placeholder nature of the site, there is insufficient information to determine market positioning, business model, or competitive advantages. The presence of a Swiss phone number and domain suggests a small local business or individual preparing for a future launch. No partnerships, certifications, or growth indicators are visible. The business sector is unclear, and no revenue streams or target customer segments can be identified from the current content.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@webtower.ch

Phone Numbers (1)

+4179489****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is minimal with no visible security headers and unknown SSL configuration. The site uses Google Tag Manager which implies some level of user tracking but lacks privacy compliance mechanisms such as cookie consent banners or privacy policies. No incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosures are present. The absence of security best practices and policies indicates a low maturity level, posing potential risks once the site becomes fully operational.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

The website is a placeholder announcing a new website coming soon. Contact information is provided but no business description or services are detailed.

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag Managergtag.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is a placeholder with minimal content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 redirect=spf.mail.hostpoint.ch
DNS Lookups:0/10

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 39 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:217.26.52.95
Name Servers:
ns.hostpoint.chDNS only
ns2.hostpoint.chDNS only
ns3.hostpoint.chDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx1.mail.hostpoint.ch
10: mx2.mail.hostpoint.ch
SOA:Serial: 1759363200, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:115ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 redirect=spf.mail.hostpoint.ch

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses basic HTML and CSS with Google Tag Manager for analytics. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected. The site is moderately performant but lacks SEO optimization and accessibility features. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. There is an opportunity to modernize the tech stack, improve SEO metadata, and enhance accessibility compliance to better serve users and search engines.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about webtower.ch

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website