Is wedding-fields.com Safe? Security Analysis for Wedding Fields
Check if wedding-fields.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Wedding Fields is a wedding coordination service provider operating primarily in Prague and Italy, boasting 19 years of experience in delivering all-inclusive wedding planning services. The company targets couples seeking comprehensive wedding coordination with an emphasis on value and quality service. The website is built on the Wix platform, featuring a professional design, clear navigation, and good mobile optimization, supporting a positive digital presence. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and age, which conflicts with the claimed business history. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, but lacks security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is limited due to missing privacy and terms of service pages. Overall, the website is safe and trustworthy for general audiences, but improvements in transparency and security practices are recommended.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The company positions itself in the hospitality sector, focusing on wedding coordination and venue services. It leverages a service-based business model targeting a niche market of wedding clients in Prague and Italy. The presence of testimonials and social media links indicates efforts to build trust and engage customers. The partnership with 'academy-fields.com' suggests a broader ecosystem or related business ventures. The lack of detailed business registration information and domain registration inconsistencies may impact perceived credibility. The website content quality and branding are consistent, supporting a positive user experience and market positioning.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Phone Numbers (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, and uses a cookie consent banner indicating some level of privacy awareness. However, the absence of critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency and preparedness visibility. The use of Sentry for error monitoring is a positive indicator of operational security monitoring. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and policy disclosures.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance legal compliance and user trust.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Wedding Fields
Wedding coordinator in Prague and Italy with 19 years of experience offering all-inclusive wedding planning services. Emphasis on great value and best service.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
basic
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enabled
- Cookie consent banner with consent mechanism
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is built on Wix platform with professional design and clear navigation.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration
LOWCurrent value: "max-age=86400"
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Facebook, LinkedIn
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, banking, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 46 days
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled
MEDIUMDomain can be transferred without authorization
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
- •No domain protection locks enabled
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings