Skip to main content

Is wfsjc.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 中国造价信息网 Reviews

Is wfsjc.com Safe? Security Analysis for 中国造价信息网

Check if wfsjc.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationChinamedium
jQueryBootstrapJavaScriptCSS
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 11:36:14 AM
45
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

中国造价信息网 is a Chinese online education information platform specializing in professional construction-related certification exams such as registered cost engineers and construction engineers. The website provides comprehensive exam-related information including registration dates, exam schedules, study materials, and results queries, targeting exam candidates and professionals in the construction and engineering sectors. The platform positions itself as a reputable source within the domestic education market for construction certifications. Technically, the website uses standard web technologies including jQuery and Bootstrap, with moderate performance and good mobile responsiveness. The hosting and domain registration are recent but consistent with the business's founding year. SEO and content structure are well implemented, though accessibility features are basic. No advanced CMS or analytics platforms are detected. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS (implied by domain and scripts), but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which reduces its security posture. There are no visible privacy or cookie policies, nor incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, indicating compliance gaps. Contact information is limited to phone numbers and contact forms, with no emails or social media presence. Overall, the website is functional, content-rich, and professionally presented but would benefit from enhanced security measures and privacy compliance to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

jQueryBootstrapJavaScriptCSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website serves a niche market of construction and engineering professionals preparing for certification exams in China. Its business model revolves around providing timely exam information, study resources, and results access, likely monetized through advertising or partnerships. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive and updated exam content and regional coverage. The target customers are exam candidates and professionals seeking certification updates. The presence of multiple related external links suggests a partnership ecosystem within the education and regional service sectors. Growth indicators include frequent content updates and a broad range of exam categories covered.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (2)

010*******
010*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security maturity level is moderate. The domain is protected against unauthorized transfers but lacks DNSSEC and HTTP security headers, which are important for preventing common web attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and similar regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are in place, which could delay response to security incidents. Data collection is minimal and limited to search forms, reducing exposure. Overall, the site should prioritize implementing security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing privacy and security policies to enhance its security posture and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

中国造价信息网

Description:

中国造价信息网,专业提供全国注册造价师,一级造价师,二级造价师,二级建造师,工程造价师,公路造价师,安装造价师等造价师报名时间,造价师报考条件,造价师考试时间,造价师考试科目,造价师准考证打印及造价师考试成绩查询服务。

Key Services:
考试报名时间发布考试真题及模拟试题成绩查询服务考试指南及报考条件相关工程师考试资讯
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryBootstrapJavaScriptCSS
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited to prevent unauthorized transfer

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Baidu linksubmit push.js
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 63 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(317 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:103.41.80.50
Name Servers:
ns1.julydns.com
ns2.julydns.com
SOA:Serial: 1751920191, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:246ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a traditional web stack with jQuery and Bootstrap for frontend development, indicating a stable but somewhat dated technology base. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags. Hosting details are limited but domain registration is recent and consistent. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. There is an opportunity to modernize the tech stack by adopting newer frameworks and improving accessibility and security configurations. The lack of CMS detection suggests a custom or lightweight backend. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security.
Analyze Another Website