Skip to main content

Is whoisproxy.com a Scam? Security Check Results - WhoisProxy.com Reviews

W

Is whoisproxy.com Safe? Security Analysis for WhoisProxy.com

Check if whoisproxy.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statessmall
HTMLCSS
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 7:46:36 AM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

WhoisProxy.com is a specialized service provider offering WHOIS privacy protection for domain registrants. Established in 2001, the company operates primarily in the technology sector, focusing on shielding registrant personal data from abuse such as spamming, identity theft, and harassment. The website clearly communicates the service benefits and includes mechanisms for abuse reporting and contact, although it lacks comprehensive privacy and cookie policies. Technically, the site is simple, built with basic HTML and CSS, with no detected advanced frameworks or CMS. The domain is registered with a reputable registrar and has a long history, supporting its legitimacy. Security practices include clientTransferProhibited domain status and encrypted email forwarding, but DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers or HTTPS enforcement details were found. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in modern security standards and compliance documentation.

Detected Technologies

HTMLCSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company targets domain registrants who require privacy protection services to prevent misuse of their WHOIS data. Its business model revolves around providing proxy contact information and encrypted email forwarding to protect registrant identities. The market position is niche but important within domain registration ecosystems. The company appears small in size, with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. The lack of social media presence and minimal marketing tools suggests a focused, possibly low-scale operation. The presence of a terms and conditions page and abuse reporting channel indicates some operational maturity. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies may limit trust and compliance with data protection regulations.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

m*****@miller.com

Phone Numbers (1)

+6448319***

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level is moderate. The domain uses clientTransferProhibited status to prevent unauthorized transfers, and the service offers encrypted email forwarding to protect registrant emails. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement for domain name systems. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement details were found, indicating potential gaps in web application security best practices. The website lacks published security policies or detailed incident response procedures, though an abuse reporting mechanism exists. Compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations is not clearly demonstrated due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security culture appears basic but functional, with opportunities for strengthening.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

WhoisProxy.com

Description:

WhoisProxy.com provides privacy protection services for domain registrants by shielding their personal WHOIS data to prevent abuse such as spamming, identity theft, harassment, stalking, and data mining.

Key Services:
WHOIS privacy protectionEncrypted email forwardingRegistrant data shielding
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTMLCSS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited to prevent unauthorized transfer
  • Use of encrypted email forwarding to protect registrant email

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website provides a clear explanation of WHOIS privacy protection services.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 75 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:3.69.87.180
Name Servers:
dns1.nsdns.infoDNS only
dns2.nsdns.infoDNS only
dns3.nsdns.infoDNS only
MX Records:
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2023041802, TTL: 28800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:143ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using basic HTML and CSS without detectable modern frameworks or CMS platforms. The hosting and registrar are Key-Systems GmbH, a reputable provider. Performance is moderate with no advanced optimization or analytics tools detected. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, indicating potential for improvement. SEO is minimal with empty meta keywords and description tags. No JavaScript libraries or external scripts were found, suggesting a static site. The lack of security headers and DNSSEC indicates technical debt in security infrastructure. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but dated and could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Analyze Another Website