Skip to main content

Is widen.net a Scam? Security Check Results - widen.net Reviews

W

Is widen.net Safe? Security Analysis for File Not Found

Check if widen.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 5:09:49 AM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website at widen.net is currently inaccessible, presenting only a minimal 'File Not Found' error page with no substantive content or metadata. This prevents a meaningful assessment of the company's business operations, services, or digital presence. The domain is registered with Amazon Registrar, Inc. since 2016 and is active until November 2025, indicating a legitimate registration but no active website content. The technical infrastructure details are limited, with no evidence of security headers, HTTPS status, or modern web technologies. Security posture cannot be properly evaluated due to lack of content and security-related information. Overall, the site appears non-operational or misconfigured, resulting in a low risk profile but also low trust and credibility scores.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of accessible website content, no business intelligence data such as market positioning, business model, or target audience can be derived. The domain age suggests the business could be established, but no public-facing information is available to confirm this. No partnerships, certifications, or contact details are present to support business credibility or operational insights.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is indeterminate given the lack of accessible content and absence of security headers or HTTPS information. The domain does not have DNSSEC enabled, which is a potential security enhancement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with common data protection regulations. Overall, the security maturity appears low or unassessable.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Restore or publish accessible website content to enable proper analysis and user engagement.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

None Detected

Website content is inaccessible, showing a minimal 'File Not Found' error page with no substantive content. No WAF or security challenge detected, but content is effectively blocked or missing.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible, showing only a 'File Not Found' error page.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC record found

HIGH

DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DNS Records

A Records:52.85.49.59, 52.85.49.29, 52.85.49.63, 52.85.49.32
Name Servers:
ns-1124.awsdns-12.orgDNS only
ns-2028.awsdns-61.co.ukDNS only
ns-213.awsdns-26.comDNS only
ns-736.awsdns-28.netDNS only
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:92ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves a minimal static error page with no metadata, scripts, or external resources. Hosting is via Amazon Registrar, Inc., but no CMS or frameworks are detectable. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. The site lacks SEO optimization and accessibility features. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be fully assessed but are likely minimal given the simple content. Technical debt is high due to lack of content and security best practices.
Analyze Another Website