Skip to main content

Is wikidata.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Wikimedia Foundation Reviews

wikidata.org favicon

Is wikidata.org Safe? Security Analysis for Wikimedia Foundation

Check if wikidata.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Stateslarge
MediaWikiJavaScriptPHPREST APIsWikibase
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 4:08:00 AM
68
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Wikidata is a free, open knowledge base operated by the Wikimedia Foundation, a reputable non-profit organization. It serves as a central repository for structured data supporting Wikimedia projects such as Wikipedia. The platform targets a broad audience including researchers, developers, and the general public, providing linked open data and APIs for data access. The business model is community-driven and non-commercial, emphasizing openness and collaboration. Technically, Wikidata is built on the MediaWiki framework with extensions like Wikibase, leveraging modern web technologies including JavaScript and PHP. The site is hosted on Wikimedia Foundation infrastructure, optimized for performance and mobile access, with good SEO and accessibility standards. The technical maturity is high, reflecting a well-maintained and scalable platform. Security posture is strong with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no detected vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is robust, with clear privacy and cookie policies aligned with GDPR. The site does not expose sensitive data and follows best practices for secure web operations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure pages were found, but the Wikimedia Foundation maintains high security standards. Overall, Wikidata presents a low-risk profile with high trustworthiness, excellent content quality, and strong technical and security foundations. Strategic recommendations include maintaining ongoing security audits, enhancing public incident response documentation, and continuing to monitor third-party dependencies to sustain security and compliance.

Detected Technologies

MediaWikiJavaScriptPHPREST APIsWikibase

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Wikidata holds a leading position in the open knowledge base market, uniquely supporting Wikimedia projects worldwide. Its competitive advantage lies in its open data model, community governance, and integration with the Wikimedia ecosystem. Revenue streams are primarily donation-based through the Wikimedia Foundation. Target customers include knowledge workers, developers, and educational institutions. Growth is driven by expanding data coverage and community contributions. Partnerships are mainly internal within Wikimedia projects, with a strong emphasis on transparency and open collaboration.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

c*****@2x.png

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity of Wikidata is high, with enforced HTTPS, modern security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities. Compliance with GDPR is evident through comprehensive privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of a public incident response page suggests incident handling is managed internally by the Wikimedia Foundation. Data protection practices are strong, with no exposed sensitive information. The security culture is mature, supported by the Foundation's reputation and operational transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Maintain regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to detect emerging threats.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Wikimedia Foundation

Description:

Wikidata is a free and open knowledge base that acts as central storage for structured data of Wikimedia projects including Wikipedia. It is operated by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization.

Key Services:
Structured data repositoryLinked open dataSupport for Wikimedia projectsData querying and APIs
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
MediaWikiJavaScriptPHPREST APIsWikibase
Frameworks:
MediaWiki frameworkWikibase
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
90/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy
  • Secure cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Matomo (self-hosted)
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:excellent

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:excellent

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:wikimedia.org ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 64 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.wikipedia.org
Issuer:E6
Valid Until:11/8/2025 (64 days)
SANs:*.m.mediawiki.org, *.m.wikibooks.org, *.m.wikidata.org +38 more

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
20 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(375 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:185.15.59.224
AAAA Records:2a02:ec80:300:ed1a::1
Name Servers:
ns0.wikimedia.org
ns1.wikimedia.org
ns2.wikimedia.org
MX Records:
10: mx-in2001.wikimedia.org
10: mx-in1001.wikimedia.org
SOA:Serial: 2025082516, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:130ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:wikimedia.org ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

Wikidata's infrastructure is robust, leveraging the MediaWiki platform and Wikibase extension for structured data management. The technology stack includes PHP and JavaScript, supported by Wikimedia's global hosting infrastructure. Performance is optimized for fast loading and mobile responsiveness. The site demonstrates technical maturity with modern SEO and accessibility features. Opportunities exist to further modernize front-end components and enhance API scalability. Technical risks are minimal given the Foundation's operational expertise and community support.
Analyze Another Website