
Is wikidata.org Safe? Security Analysis for Wikimedia Foundation
Check if wikidata.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Wikidata is a free, open knowledge base operated by the Wikimedia Foundation, a reputable non-profit organization. It serves as a central repository for structured data supporting Wikimedia projects such as Wikipedia. The platform targets a broad audience including researchers, developers, and the general public, providing linked open data and APIs for data access. The business model is community-driven and non-commercial, emphasizing openness and collaboration. Technically, Wikidata is built on the MediaWiki framework with extensions like Wikibase, leveraging modern web technologies including JavaScript and PHP. The site is hosted on Wikimedia Foundation infrastructure, optimized for performance and mobile access, with good SEO and accessibility standards. The technical maturity is high, reflecting a well-maintained and scalable platform. Security posture is strong with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no detected vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is robust, with clear privacy and cookie policies aligned with GDPR. The site does not expose sensitive data and follows best practices for secure web operations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure pages were found, but the Wikimedia Foundation maintains high security standards. Overall, Wikidata presents a low-risk profile with high trustworthiness, excellent content quality, and strong technical and security foundations. Strategic recommendations include maintaining ongoing security audits, enhancing public incident response documentation, and continuing to monitor third-party dependencies to sustain security and compliance.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Wikidata holds a leading position in the open knowledge base market, uniquely supporting Wikimedia projects worldwide. Its competitive advantage lies in its open data model, community governance, and integration with the Wikimedia ecosystem. Revenue streams are primarily donation-based through the Wikimedia Foundation. Target customers include knowledge workers, developers, and educational institutions. Growth is driven by expanding data coverage and community contributions. Partnerships are mainly internal within Wikimedia projects, with a strong emphasis on transparency and open collaboration.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The security maturity of Wikidata is high, with enforced HTTPS, modern security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities. Compliance with GDPR is evident through comprehensive privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of a public incident response page suggests incident handling is managed internally by the Wikimedia Foundation. Data protection practices are strong, with no exposed sensitive information. The security culture is mature, supported by the Foundation's reputation and operational transparency.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Maintain regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to detect emerging threats.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Wikimedia Foundation
Wikidata is a free and open knowledge base that acts as central storage for structured data of Wikimedia projects including Wikipedia. It is operated by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization.
excellent
consistent
Technical Stack
fast
good
good
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Content Security Policy
- Secure cookies
- No exposed sensitive data
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 64 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Certificate Details
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings