Skip to main content

Is wikiedu.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Wiki Education Reviews

W

Is wikiedu.org Safe? Security Analysis for Wiki Education

Check if wikiedu.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationUnited Statesmedium
WordPress 6.8.2jQuery 3.7.1MediaElement.jsJetpack pluginPardot plugin+1 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 4:43:36 AM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Wiki Education is a well-established non-profit organization founded in 2010 that focuses on engaging students, academics, and professionals to improve Wikipedia and other open knowledge platforms. The organization offers educational courses, partnerships, and consulting services aimed at enhancing the quality and reach of Wikipedia content. Their target audience includes college instructors, scholars, scientists, and institutions. The website reflects a strong market position as a leader in educational engagement with Wikipedia, supported by testimonials and clear organizational transparency. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and frameworks such as Jetpack and Pardot, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS services. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, although performance is moderate. Security is robust with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections, but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers. Privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, but the absence of a cookie consent mechanism is a minor gap. The security posture is solid with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the lack of an explicit incident response or security policy page and missing security headers are areas for improvement. The WHOIS data shows privacy protection usage typical for non-profits, with a domain age consistent with the organization's history, supporting legitimacy. Overall, Wiki Education's website is professional, trustworthy, and secure, with minor recommendations to enhance privacy compliance and security hardening. The site is safe for general audiences and effectively supports the organization's mission to improve Wikipedia through academic collaboration.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2jQuery 3.7.1MediaElement.jsJetpack pluginPardot pluginCloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Wiki Education operates in the education sector as a non-profit organization focused on improving Wikipedia content through academic engagement. Their business model revolves around providing educational courses, partnerships, and consulting services to institutions and individuals. The organization benefits from a strong reputation and trust signals such as testimonials and transparent disclosures. Their target customers are educators, scholars, and institutions seeking to integrate Wikipedia into their curricula or sponsor content improvements. The website content and structure indicate a mature digital presence with ongoing content updates and community engagement. Partnerships and social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn support their outreach and growth. The organization appears financially transparent with published financials and annual plans, reinforcing credibility.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections in place. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an opportunity to strengthen defenses against common web attacks. The lack of an explicit incident response or security policy page limits transparency on how security incidents are managed. Privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, but the missing cookie consent mechanism is a compliance gap. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be enhanced by implementing recommended best practices and improving transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Wiki Education

Description:

Wiki Education engages students and academics to improve Wikipedia by involving students, scholars, scientists, archivists, librarians, and other members of academic and cultural institutions in sharing knowledge through Wikipedia, Wikidata, and other open collaboration projects.

Key Services:
Teach With Wikipedia coursesWikipedia course sponsorshipConsulting expertiseSpeaker seriesDashboard for course management
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2jQuery 3.7.1MediaElement.jsJetpack pluginPardot pluginCloudflare DNS
Frameworks:
Bootstrap (implied by navbar classes)WordPress theme understrap
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Jetpack Stats
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Jetpack Stats (stats.wp.com)
Marketing Tools:
Pardot
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professionally maintained non-profit educational platform.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:aspmx.pardot.com include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@wikiedu.org

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 81 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
15 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(323 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:45.79.140.16
Name Servers:
cleo.ns.cloudflare.com
vita.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382461288, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:78ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:aspmx.pardot.com include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with a child theme based on Understrap, leveraging jQuery and MediaElement.js for media handling. Jetpack and Pardot plugins are used for analytics and marketing automation. Hosting appears to be behind Cloudflare DNS services, providing performance and security benefits. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, likely due to media-rich content and plugin usage. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. There is room for technical improvement by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the organization's mission effectively with modern and maintainable technologies.
Analyze Another Website