Is wikimedia.org Safe? Security Analysis for Wikimedia Foundation
Check if wikimedia.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The Wikimedia website represents the global Wikimedia movement, a large non-profit organization dedicated to creating and sharing free knowledge worldwide. The site showcases multiple Wikimedia projects such as Wikipedia, Wiktionary, and Commons, all operated by the Wikimedia Foundation. The organization is well-established and recognized globally as a leader in free knowledge dissemination. Technically, the site uses the MediaWiki platform and standard web technologies, delivering fast performance with excellent mobile optimization and accessibility. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and consistent branding, reflecting a mature digital presence. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and follows good security practices, though explicit security headers and a published security policy are absent. Privacy compliance is strong with a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of use, but a cookie consent mechanism is missing. No vulnerabilities or suspicious elements were detected. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and safe for general audiences. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable due to malformed output but the domain is consistent with the Wikimedia Foundation's identity. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, adding cookie consent, and publishing security and vulnerability disclosure policies.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Wikimedia Foundation operates as a non-profit entity focused on free knowledge sharing through a suite of community-driven projects. Its market position is dominant in the free encyclopedia and open knowledge space. The business model relies on donations and community contributions rather than commercial revenue. The target audience is global and general public. The organization benefits from a strong partnership ecosystem within the Wikimedia movement and maintains a high level of trust and transparency. Growth is driven by community engagement and expanding project offerings.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information is available. Privacy compliance is strong, but cookie consent mechanisms should be implemented to fully comply with GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be improved with formal policies and enhanced headers.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and enforce security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Wikimedia Foundation
The Wikimedia movement is a global community of people, projects, and activities working together to create and share knowledge freely. The Wikimedia Foundation is the non-profit organization that hosts all Wikimedia projects and supports communities worldwide who create and curate freely accessible content.
excellent
consistent
Technical Stack
fast
excellent
good
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- No vulnerable libraries detected
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content about Wikimedia projects.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 64 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings