Skip to main content

Is wikipedia.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Wikimedia Foundation Reviews

wikipedia.org favicon

Is wikipedia.org Safe? Security Analysis for Wikimedia Foundation

Check if wikipedia.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitN/alarge
JavaScriptCSS3HTML5
Analyzed 9/4/2025Completed 11:28:44 AM
64
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Wikipedia, operated by the Wikimedia Foundation, is a globally recognized non-profit organization providing a free online encyclopedia created and maintained by volunteers worldwide. It holds a leading market position as the largest multilingual knowledge resource, offering over 7 million articles in English alone and millions more in other languages. The business model is donation-based, emphasizing free access to knowledge without advertising distractions. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and excellent content quality, targeting a general audience seeking reliable information.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptCSS3HTML5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The Wikimedia Foundation's ecosystem includes numerous sister projects such as Commons, Wikivoyage, Wiktionary, and others, expanding its reach in free knowledge dissemination. The organization benefits from a strong global brand, a large volunteer base, and a sustainable donation-driven revenue stream. Its market positioning as a trusted, ad-free knowledge platform provides competitive advantages. The foundation's partnerships primarily revolve around donation processing and community coordination. Growth indicators include expanding article counts and multilingual support.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

W*****@2x.png

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS with excellent SSL configuration, ensuring secure data transmission. While explicit security headers are not visible in the HTML content, the site follows best practices by not exposing sensitive data and securing user input forms. However, no explicit security policy or incident response contacts are found on the main page, and no security.txt file is detected. The privacy policy is comprehensive and GDPR compliant, reflecting a mature privacy posture. Overall, the security maturity is high but could be improved by adding explicit security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Wikimedia Foundation

Description:

Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia, created and edited by volunteers around the world and hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Key Services:
Free encyclopedia contentMultilingual knowledge accessHosting sister projects (Commons, Wikivoyage, Wiktionary, etc.)
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptCSS3HTML5
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

excellent

SEO:

excellent

Security Assessment

Security Score:
90/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data
  • Secure forms with CSRF tokens (implied by form structure)

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:excellent

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:excellent

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and multilingual support.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_cidrs.wikimedia.org ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc-rua@wikimedia.org
Forensic Reports:dmarc-ruf@wikimedia.org

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 65 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.wikipedia.org
Issuer:E6
Valid Until:11/8/2025 (65 days)
SANs:*.m.mediawiki.org, *.m.wikibooks.org, *.m.wikidata.org +38 more

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
24 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(128 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:185.15.59.224
AAAA Records:2a02:ec80:300:ed1a::1
Name Servers:
ns0.wikimedia.org
ns1.wikimedia.org
ns2.wikimedia.org
MX Records:
10: mx-in1001.wikimedia.org
10: mx-in2001.wikimedia.org
SOA:Serial: 2025080821, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:27ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_cidrs.wikimedia.org ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern tech stack with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, powered by the MediaWiki CMS platform. It demonstrates excellent mobile optimization and accessibility features, ensuring a broad user reach. Performance is fast with efficient content delivery. The site uses minimal third-party scripts, focusing on user experience and privacy. There is no indication of technical debt or outdated technologies. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and formalize vulnerability disclosure processes to reduce technical risks.
Analyze Another Website