Skip to main content

Is windowslatvia.com a Scam? Security Check Results - windowslatvia.com Reviews

windowslatvia.com favicon

Is windowslatvia.com Safe? Security Analysis for Koka Logi un Moduļu mājas

Check if windowslatvia.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingLatviasmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptWOFF2 fonts
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:04:51 PM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website windowslatvia.com represents a Latvian business specializing in the manufacturing and sale of wooden windows and modular houses, targeting the European market. The site claims 15 years of experience and emphasizes energy-efficient products and certified production. The domain is newly registered in 2024, which may indicate a recent digital presence for an established business or a startup. Technically, the website uses standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with good mobile optimization but lacks advanced frameworks or CMS indications. Security posture is basic, with no DNSSEC enabled and no visible security headers or privacy policies, which poses compliance and trust challenges. No WAF or blocking mechanisms are detected, and the site content is accessible and safe for general audiences.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptWOFF2 fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on wooden windows and modular houses, serving consumers and businesses across Europe. The business model appears to be direct manufacturing and sales, with a focus on energy efficiency and innovation. The website content is basic but relevant, with moderate branding consistency. The lack of contact information and policies online may limit customer trust and regulatory compliance. The domain's recent registration contrasts with the claimed 15 years of experience, suggesting either a domain change or new online presence. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the data.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

L*****@windowslatvia.lvkristiana

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712515****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is low to moderate. The domain lacks DNSSEC, and no security headers are detected, which increases risk exposure. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The site uses HTTPS (assumed but not explicitly confirmed), but SSL configuration details are unknown. No analytics or tracking scripts are found, reducing privacy risks but also limiting marketing insights. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing incident response contacts.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Koka logi. Energoefektīvi logi. Karkasa mājas. 15.gadu pieredze visā Eiropā. Sertificēta ražotne. Inovatīvi.

Key Services:
Wooden windows manufacturingEnergy-efficient windowsModular houses construction
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptWOFF2 fonts
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is in Latvian language targeting European market.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

85/100
Score

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 36 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(302 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:103.169.142.0
Name Servers:
ns1.systemdns.com
ns2.systemdns.com
ns3.systemdns.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with standard web technologies without reliance on major CMS or frameworks. It uses custom fonts loaded via WOFF2 and has responsive design features for mobile devices. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of optimization or caching. SEO is basic with meta description present but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data detected. Hosting provider details are limited to registrar information. There is an opportunity to modernize the tech stack, improve SEO with structured data, and enhance accessibility features.
Analyze Another Website