Skip to main content

Is winesino.com a Scam? Security Check Results - winesino.com Reviews

W

Is winesino.com Safe? Security Analysis for Danmark HEALTH AND DISEASE

Check if winesino.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HealthcareN/asmall
HTML5CSSCloudflare DNS
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 3:37:08 AM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website winesino.com operates as a multilingual health information portal, aggregating articles related to health and disease across various languages and regional domains. It targets a general audience seeking health-related knowledge rather than providing commercial services. The business model appears to be content publishing and dissemination without direct user engagement or e-commerce. The domain is well-established since 2015, indicating a stable presence in its niche. Technically, the site uses basic HTML and CSS with Cloudflare DNS services but lacks advanced frameworks or CMS indicators. The site shows moderate performance and basic mobile optimization but lacks modern SEO and accessibility features. No analytics or tracking technologies are detected, suggesting minimal user tracking. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers, DNSSEC is not enabled, and there is no explicit confirmation of HTTPS usage in the provided data. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no contact or incident response information is available, indicating low privacy compliance and limited security posture. The domain registration is transparent and consistent with the website content, supporting moderate legitimacy. Overall, the website is functional as an informational resource but requires significant improvements in privacy compliance, security best practices, and business transparency to enhance trust and user confidence.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSSCloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Winesino.com positions itself as a multilingual health content aggregator, leveraging multiple regional domains to reach diverse audiences. Its competitive advantage lies in language diversity and health topic coverage. The business model is primarily informational with no direct monetization or user interaction features detected. The absence of contact details and policies suggests a low-touch operation model. Growth potential depends on content quality improvements and establishing trust through compliance and transparency. The partnership ecosystem includes related health domains but no clear commercial partnerships or subsidiaries are identified.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a low security maturity level with no visible security headers, no DNSSEC, and no published security or privacy policies. The lack of HTTPS confirmation and absence of incident response contacts indicate potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators are detected in the provided content, but the security posture is weak due to missing best practices. The site would benefit from implementing HTTPS, security headers, privacy and cookie policies, and establishing incident response mechanisms to improve resilience and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

The website provides multilingual health-related content focusing on diseases, treatments, and health information. It aggregates articles in multiple languages related to health and disease topics.

Key Services:
Health articlesDisease informationMultilingual health content
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSSCloudflare DNS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, health

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mx.cloudflare.net ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:6926587d8dd143c39edcd44824ec1e92@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.net

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 57 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:winesino.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:9/29/2025 (57 days)
SANs:winesino.com, *.winesino.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
10 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1247 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.38.114, 172.67.222.70
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3034::6815:2672, 2606:4700:3035::ac43:de46
Name Servers:
asa.ns.cloudflare.com
titan.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
65: route3.mx.cloudflare.net
28: route1.mx.cloudflare.net
24: route2.mx.cloudflare.net
SOA:Serial: 2377068837, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:257ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mx.cloudflare.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with basic HTML and CSS without modern JavaScript frameworks or CMS platforms. Hosting appears to be behind Cloudflare DNS but no CDN or WAF is detected. The site has moderate performance and basic mobile responsiveness but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking scripts, indicating minimal technical complexity. The absence of forms or interactive elements reduces attack surface but also limits user engagement. Technical debt is moderate due to missing security and compliance features, presenting opportunities for modernization and improved user experience.
Analyze Another Website