Is woodfin.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Woodfin
Check if woodfin.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Woodfin.lv is a website currently in maintenance mode, displaying minimal content with a simple message indicating the site will be available soon. The site uses WordPress CMS with a maintenance plugin and loads standard web fonts and jQuery libraries. No business description, contact information, or interactive elements are present, limiting insight into the company's operations or market position. The domain WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, restricting verification of domain registration details and ownership. The website is secured with HTTPS but lacks security headers and privacy compliance documentation, indicating a basic security posture. Overall, the site appears to be a small business or startup with limited online presence at this time.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Due to the maintenance status and lack of content, detailed business intelligence is unavailable. The company name 'Woodfin' is visible, but no further information about services, market positioning, or partnerships is provided. The website targets a Latvian audience as indicated by the language and domain country code. No contact or legal information is disclosed, which limits assessment of business credibility and operational scale.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website enforces HTTPS, which is a positive security measure. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No forms or data collection mechanisms are present, reducing immediate risk but also limiting user engagement. The lack of WHOIS data reduces transparency and trust. Overall, the security posture is basic and could be improved by implementing standard security headers, privacy documentation, and contact information.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement standard HTTP security headers to enhance protection against common attacks.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Woodfin
poor
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
basic
basic
poor
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is currently in maintenance mode with minimal content.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 86 days
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings