Skip to main content

Is woodsborobank.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Woodsboro Bank Reviews

woodsborobank.com favicon

Is woodsborobank.com Safe? Security Analysis for Woodsboro Bank

Check if woodsborobank.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceUnited Statesmedium
WordPressGravity FormsYoast SEOGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager+1 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 12:51:57 AM
66
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Woodsboro Bank is a well-established community bank based in Maryland, serving personal and business banking needs with a strong focus on local decision-making and personalized service. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on WordPress with modern SEO and accessibility practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA usage, though explicit security policies and headers are not evident. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, representing a compliance gap. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and aligned with the bank's community-oriented brand.

Detected Technologies

WordPressGravity FormsYoast SEOGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerreCAPTCHA

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The bank leverages its long history and local roots to position itself as a trusted community financial institution. Its business model emphasizes personalized service and local decision-making, targeting residents and businesses in Frederick County, Maryland. The website showcases key services including personal and business banking, home loans, and industry-specific solutions. The absence of explicit contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for contact forms, which may impact direct customer engagement. The bank maintains a clean partnership ecosystem with mortgage services linked externally.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA to secure user interactions, particularly on contact forms. However, the lack of visible security headers and absence of published security or incident response policies indicate room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site does not provide a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file, which could enhance transparency and trust. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced header configurations.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Woodsboro Bank

Description:

Community is Our Business. Woodsboro Bank is a community bank serving Frederick County, Maryland since 1899, providing personal and business banking, home loans, and industry-tailored financial services with a focus on local decision-making and personal service.

Key Services:
Personal BankingBusiness BankingHome LoansInvestment ServicesEstate ServicesIndustry-specific banking solutions
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressGravity FormsYoast SEOGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerreCAPTCHA
Frameworks:
Flatsome WordPress Theme
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well-structured.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

85/100
Score

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:52.128.108.87 ip4:52.128.115.87 ip4:64.235.154.105 ip4:64.235.154.140 ip4:216.116.87.14 ip4:35.172.36.41 ip4:209.61.151.231 ip4:173.10.158.1 ip4:208.253.118.194 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf1.netteller.com include:spfref.jackhe nry.com include:mx1.jhahosted.com include:jhahosted.com -all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 40 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
26 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(753 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:141.193.213.10, 141.193.213.11
Name Servers:
pns21.cpimsp.net
pns22.cpimsp.net
pns23.cpimsp.net
pns24.cpimsp.net
MX Records:
0: woodsborobank-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2024121001, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:286ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:52.128.108.87 ip4:52.128.115.87 ip4:64.235.154.105 ip4:64.235.154.140 ip4:216.116.87.14 ip4:35.172.36.41 ip4:209.61.151.231 ip4:173.10.158.1 ip4:208.253.118.194 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf1.netteller.com include:spfref.jackhe nry.com include:mx1.jhahosted.com include:jhahosted.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress using the Flatsome theme and integrates several modern technologies including Gravity Forms for contact forms, Yoast SEO for search optimization, and Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO metadata and structured data. Performance is moderate, with prefetching of key scripts and images. No critical technical issues or deprecated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit in the HTML content.
Analyze Another Website