Skip to main content

Is wordcamp.org a Scam? Security Check Results - WordCamp Central Reviews

W

Is wordcamp.org Safe? Security Analysis for WordCamp Central

Check if wordcamp.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
WordPressGutenbergjQueryReactGoogle Tag Manager+1 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 4:11:32 AM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

WordCamp Central serves as the official hub for WordCamp conferences and WordPress community events worldwide. It provides comprehensive scheduling, news updates, and resources for organizers and attendees, positioning itself as a key community-driven platform within the WordPress ecosystem. The website is well-structured, professionally designed, and targets a broad audience of WordPress users, developers, and contributors. Technically, it leverages WordPress CMS with modern technologies including Gutenberg blocks, React, and Google Tag Manager, ensuring a responsive and accessible user experience. Security posture is solid with enforced HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers could be improved. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, with consent mechanisms implemented. The WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which is justified for this type of community platform. Overall, the site demonstrates high trustworthiness and professionalism.

Detected Technologies

WordPressGutenbergjQueryReactGoogle Tag ManagerJetpack

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The platform operates as a non-profit community resource under the WordPress Foundation umbrella, focusing on event coordination and information dissemination rather than direct commercial activities. Its market position is strong within the WordPress ecosystem as the central source for WordCamp event information globally. Revenue streams likely include sponsorships from hosting providers and WordPress-related service companies. The partnership ecosystem includes major WordPress sponsors such as Jetpack, Bluehost, Kinsta, and WooCommerce. The business model emphasizes community engagement and open source collaboration, targeting WordPress users and contributors worldwide. Growth indicators include a robust schedule of upcoming events and active news updates.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website maintains a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the HTML content. Incident response is facilitated via an incident report page, though dedicated security contact emails are not publicly listed. Privacy compliance is strong with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to high, suitable for a community event platform.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

WordCamp Central

Description:

WordCamp Central is a platform dedicated to WordCamp conferences and WordPress events worldwide, providing schedules, news, and resources for organizers and attendees.

Key Services:
Event scheduling and listingsNews and updates about WordPress community eventsResources for event organizersSponsorship information
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressGutenbergjQueryReactGoogle Tag ManagerJetpack
Frameworks:
Gutenberg Blocks
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with async loading
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Jetpack StatsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Jetpack Stats
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Official WordPress community site focused on WordCamp events

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

73/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

12/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

90/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:66.155.40.205/32 ip4:66.155.40.24/32 ip4:66.155.40.234/32 ip4:198.143.164.0/24 include:helpscoutemail.com include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:0bqp2jnw@ag.dmarcian.com
Forensic Reports:0bqp2jnw@fr.dmarcian.com
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
19 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(305 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:198.143.164.106
Name Servers:
ns1.wordpress.org
ns2.wordpress.org
ns3.wordpress.org
ns4.wordpress.org
MX Records:
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2017012001, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:45ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:66.155.40.205/32 ip4:66.155.40.24/32 ip4:66.155.40.234/32 ip4:198.143.164.0/24 include:helpscoutemail.com include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Gutenberg block editor and React libraries, indicating a modern and modular front-end architecture. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Jetpack for analytics and performance monitoring. The site is mobile responsive with good accessibility features and SEO optimization. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external scripts and image assets. Hosting provider details are not explicitly disclosed. The technical implementation reflects a mature and well-maintained platform with opportunities to improve security headers and streamline third-party dependencies.
Analyze Another Website