Skip to main content

Is wordpressfoundation.org a Scam? Security Check Results - WordPress Foundation Reviews

wordpressfoundation.org favicon

Is wordpressfoundation.org Safe? Security Analysis for WordPress Foundation

Check if wordpressfoundation.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitUnited Statessmall
WordPress CMSPHPjQueryGutenberg BlocksJetpack Plugin
Analyzed 9/4/2025Completed 10:12:47 PM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The WordPress Foundation is a US-based non-profit organization dedicated to supporting the WordPress open source project and community. Founded by Matt Mullenweg, it focuses on ensuring free access to WordPress software, protecting trademarks, and educating the public. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear mission statements and published financial transparency. The foundation operates primarily in the non-profit sector, targeting the WordPress community and open source advocates worldwide. Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS using the TwentyFifteen theme and leverages Jetpack plugins for enhanced functionality such as search and analytics. The site is served over HTTPS with a moderate performance profile and good mobile optimization. Accessibility and SEO are basic to good, with room for improvement in accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and domain registration protections but lacks visible security headers and published security policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no explicit privacy or terms of service pages found in the analyzed content. Overall, the WordPress Foundation website is trustworthy and professionally maintained, with a solid business credibility and technical foundation. Strategic improvements in security policies, privacy disclosures, and contact information publication would enhance compliance and user trust.

Detected Technologies

WordPress CMSPHPjQueryGutenberg BlocksJetpack Plugin

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The WordPress Foundation holds a strong market position as a key non-profit entity supporting the WordPress ecosystem. Its competitive advantage lies in its stewardship of trademarks and commitment to open source principles. The foundation's business model is donation and community support-driven, with revenue streams likely from donations and sponsorships. Target customers include WordPress users, developers, and open source advocates globally. Growth indicators include expanding scholarship programs and published annual reports. Partnerships with organizations like Mozilla Foundation and Public Code highlight its collaborative ecosystem. Operationally, the foundation maintains transparency and community engagement, reinforcing its strategic role in the WordPress community.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security maturity level is moderate. The site benefits from HTTPS encryption and domain registration safeguards but lacks advanced security headers and published incident response or security policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified, indicating good baseline security hygiene. Compliance gaps exist in GDPR-related disclosures and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Incident response readiness is unclear due to absence of contact channels for security issues. The security culture appears focused on stability and transparency but would benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve privacy compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

WordPress Foundation

Description:

The WordPress Foundation is a charitable organization founded by Matt Mullenweg to further the mission of the WordPress open source project: to democratize publishing through Open Source, GPL software. It ensures free access to software projects it supports, protects WordPress and related trademarks, and educates the public about WordPress and open source software.

Key Services:
Trademark protectionScholarships (e.g., Kim Parsell Memorial Scholarship)Community support and educationFinancial transparency via published financial reports
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress CMSPHPjQueryGutenberg BlocksJetpack Plugin
Frameworks:
WordPress Theme TwentyFifteen
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of latest WordPress version (6.9-alpha) indicating active maintenance

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Jetpack Stats
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Jetpack Stats (stats.wp.com)
Marketing Tools:
Jetpack Search
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a well-maintained WordPress site for a non-profit foundation.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

88/100
Score

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

10/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:66.155.40.30 +ip4:66.155.40.24 +include:mail.zendesk.com include:helpscoutemail.com include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:0bqp2jnw@ag.dmarcian.com
Forensic Reports:0bqp2jnw@fr.dmarcian.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 80 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
19 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(104 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:66.155.40.24
Name Servers:
ns1.mobiusltd.com
ns2.mobiusltd.com
MX Records:
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2025082601, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:143ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:66.155.40.30 +ip4:66.155.40.24 +include:mail.zendesk.com include:helpscoutemail.com include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a stable and widely used CMS platform (WordPress) with a classic theme (TwentyFifteen) and enhanced by Jetpack plugins for search and analytics. The technology stack is modern and well-supported, though the site uses an alpha version of WordPress (6.9-alpha), which may require monitoring for stability. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness. SEO is adequately addressed through meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified, but domain registration is managed by reputable registrars. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the foundation's mission effectively but has opportunities for modernization and security enhancements.
Analyze Another Website