Skip to main content

Is wordtracker.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Wordtracker Reviews

W

Is wordtracker.com Safe? Security Analysis for Wordtracker

Check if wordtracker.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsStripe.jsreCAPTCHAFontAwesome+4 more
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 10:36:26 AM
68
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Wordtracker operates a technology-focused website offering a free keyword research tool aimed at SEO professionals and digital marketers. The platform positions itself as a competitive alternative to Google's Keyword Planner, emphasizing the discovery of profitable longtail keywords. The website demonstrates a moderate level of digital maturity, utilizing modern analytics and marketing technologies such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Stripe for payments, and reCAPTCHA for bot protection. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about the domain's legitimacy and ownership transparency. Security measures are partially implemented with HTTPS and CSRF tokens, but lack comprehensive security headers and published security policies. Overall, the website is professional and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and clearer business credibility indicators.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsStripe.jsreCAPTCHAFontAwesomeAngularJS (indicated by ng-cloak)PostHog analyticsDrift chatFirstPromoter

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Wordtracker targets a niche market of SEO and digital marketing professionals by providing keyword research tools that help optimize online content. Its business model likely includes freemium SaaS offerings with paid upgrades, supported by integrated payment processing via Stripe. The use of affiliate marketing tools like FirstPromoter suggests a growth strategy leveraging partnerships. The website's market position as a free alternative to Google's tool indicates a competitive advantage in accessibility and keyword volume. However, the lack of publicly available company registration and contact details limits transparency and may impact trust among potential customers. The technology stack and marketing integrations reflect a modern approach to customer acquisition and retention.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and employs reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse, indicating a baseline security posture. CSRF tokens are present, enhancing form security. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits the organization's readiness to handle security incidents transparently. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Wordtracker

Description:

Wordtracker offers a free keyword research tool that serves as an alternative to the Keyword Planner, providing thousands of profitable longtail keywords with up to 10,000 results per search.

Key Services:
Keyword research toolSEO analytics
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsStripe.jsreCAPTCHAFontAwesomeAngularJS (indicated by ng-cloak)PostHog analyticsDrift chatFirstPromoter
Frameworks:
AngularJS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • CSRF tokens present in meta tags
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and analytics for monitoring

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsPostHogGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel (via connect.facebook.net)PostHog
Marketing Tools:
Drift chatGleam.io
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

70/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:emsd1.com ~all v=spf1 include:mailgun.org servers.mcsv.net a:mail.wordtracker.com a:vweb.wordtracker.com a:rhodium.wordtracker.com include:getresponse.com include:sendgrid.net ip4:78.46.25.53 ip4:74.63.47.98 ~all v=spf1 include:servers.mcsv.net ?all
DNS Lookups:8/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 78 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Invalid SPF Record

MEDIUM

SPF record syntax is invalid

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
26 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(562 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:3.164.206.93, 3.164.206.82, 3.164.206.84, 3.164.206.37
Name Servers:
ns-130.awsdns-16.com
ns-1481.awsdns-57.org
ns-1970.awsdns-54.co.uk
ns-944.awsdns-54.net
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: mxa.mailgun.org
10: mxb.mailgun.org
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:43ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:mailgun.org servers.mcsv.net a:mail.wordtracker.com a:vweb.wordtracker.com a:rhodium.wordtracker.com include:getresponse.com include:sendgrid.net ip4:78.46.25.53 ip4:74.63.47.98 ~all v=spf1 include:servers.mcsv.net ?all v=spf1 include:emsd1.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website leverages a modern technology stack including AngularJS for frontend rendering, Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking, Stripe for payment processing, and reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation. The use of FontAwesome provides rich iconography. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and preconnect hints for fonts. Mobile optimization is good, supported by viewport meta tags and responsive CSS. Accessibility features are basic, with some use of ARIA attributes implied by AngularJS directives. SEO is supported by meta description and viewport tags. However, the absence of a CMS or hosting provider information limits deeper infrastructure insights. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from updated frameworks and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Analyze Another Website