Skip to main content

Is wowpartners.com a Scam? Security Check Results - WowPartners Reviews

wowpartners.com favicon

Is wowpartners.com Safe? Security Analysis for WowPartners

Check if wowpartners.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/amedium
Webflow CMSGoogle Tag ManagerjQuerySplide.js (carousel)WebFont Loader
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 6:47:02 AM
68
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

WowPartners operates as a casino and sportsbook affiliate program, providing flexible commission models and access to multiple innovative brands. The company targets affiliate marketers in the iGaming sector, offering detailed reporting and expert support to maximize affiliate revenue. The website is professionally designed using modern web technologies and hosted on Webflow, with good mobile optimization and user experience. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage but lacks explicit security headers and privacy policies. The absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, though the website content and affiliate testimonials suggest a legitimate business. Strategic recommendations include improving security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and verifying domain registration details to enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

Webflow CMSGoogle Tag ManagerjQuerySplide.js (carousel)WebFont Loader

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

WowPartners positions itself as a competitive affiliate program in the online gambling industry, leveraging multiple casino and sportsbook brands to attract affiliates. Its business model is commission-based affiliate marketing with options like CPA, RevShare, and hybrid models. The program supports affiliates with detailed reporting and a variety of marketing materials. The presence of numerous affiliate testimonials and active brand promotions indicates a well-established partnership ecosystem. The company appears to be medium-sized with a focus on European and international markets, though exact geographic location is not disclosed. The lack of public WHOIS data is a notable gap in transparency.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (7)

a*****@wowpartners.com
s*****@wowpartners.com
a*****@wowpartners.com
l*****@wowpartners.com
m*****@wowpartners.com
+2 more emails found

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and forms require validation, reducing some risk of data exposure. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response information, which limits transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no clear GDPR or cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an affiliate marketing site but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

WowPartners

Description:

WowPartners is a casino and sportsbook affiliate program offering flexible commissions, innovative brands, and expert guidance to boost affiliate profits.

Key Services:
Affiliate program managementFlexible commission models (CPA, RevShare, Hybrid, Sub-affiliate)Access to multiple casino and sportsbook brandsDetailed reportingAffiliate support
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Webflow CMSGoogle Tag ManagerjQuerySplide.js (carousel)WebFont Loader
Frameworks:
Webflow
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form inputs with required fields

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Referon platform (affiliate platform)
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive elements.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:ipm6e3m@ar.glockapps.com
Forensic Reports:ipm6e3m@fr.glockapps.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 66 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

21 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:99.83.190.102, 75.2.70.75
Name Servers:
kate.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
toby.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
1: smtp.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as Splide.js for carousels and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site loads multimedia content including videos and images optimized for desktop and mobile. Performance is moderate with responsive design and fluid typography. The technical implementation is clean with no broken elements detected. However, the absence of security headers and privacy mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Hosting is managed by Webflow, which provides a stable infrastructure but requires the site owner to implement additional security controls.
Analyze Another Website