Skip to main content

Is wpcharitable.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Charitable Reviews

wpcharitable.com favicon

Is wpcharitable.com Safe? Security Analysis for Charitable

Check if wpcharitable.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitN/asmall
WordPressPHPJavaScriptStripe APIDrip API+2 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 1:26:49 PM
70
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Charitable is a specialized WordPress donation plugin provider targeting non-profit organizations seeking affordable and powerful fundraising software. The website positions itself as a top-rated solution with a focus on ease of use and cost-effectiveness. The technical infrastructure is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript and PHP technologies, integrating third-party services such as Stripe for payments, Drip for marketing automation, and Sleeknote for lead capture. The site demonstrates good SEO practices and mobile optimization, reflecting a mature digital presence. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure, but lacks published security policies and vulnerability disclosures. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises some concerns about domain legitimacy, though the website content and branding are professional and consistent. Overall, the site is trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance documentation.

Detected Technologies

WordPressPHPJavaScriptStripe APIDrip APISleeknoteGoogle Analytics (MonsterInsights plugin)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Charitable operates in the non-profit software sector, offering a WordPress plugin that facilitates donations and fundraising campaigns. Its business model revolves around plugin sales and support services, targeting non-profit organizations and charities. The company appears to be small-sized, founded around 2017, with a clear market niche and competitive positioning as a cost-effective alternative to expensive fundraising software. The website integrates marketing and analytics tools to support growth and customer engagement. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The lack of explicit contact information and WHOIS data suggests a need for improved business transparency to strengthen credibility.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and uses Google Analytics with IP anonymization, indicating attention to user privacy. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and there is no published security policy or incident response contact information. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file limits the ability for external security researchers to report issues responsibly. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by publishing security policies, implementing security headers, and providing clear incident response channels.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Charitable

Description:

Charitable is the best WordPress donation plugin for non-profits who want powerful fundraising software without the high price.

Key Services:
WordPress donation pluginFundraising software
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressPHPJavaScriptStripe APIDrip APISleeknoteGoogle Analytics (MonsterInsights plugin)
Frameworks:
Gutenberg blocks
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

excellent

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google Analytics anonymize IP enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics via MonsterInsights
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Drip
Marketing Tools:
DripSleeknoteMonsterInsights Google Analytics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15768000"

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

65/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

100/100
Score
No issues found
SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:73f233a689a0430994a698174cbd66b3@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.net
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 44 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:wpcharitable.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/21/2025 (44 days)
SANs:wpcharitable.com, *.wpcharitable.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
11 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1435 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:172.67.69.175, 104.26.10.143, 104.26.11.143
AAAA Records:2606:4700:20::ac43:45af, 2606:4700:20::681a:a8f, 2606:4700:20::681a:b8f
Name Servers:
ara.ns.cloudflare.com
coby.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382392009, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:64ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS using modern Gutenberg blocks and integrates multiple third-party services including Stripe for payments, Drip for marketing automation, and Sleeknote for lead capture. Google Analytics is implemented via the MonsterInsights plugin with IP anonymization enabled. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with some deferred CSS and JavaScript loading. No hosting provider information was detected. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, but the site lacks some security best practices such as security headers and published security documentation.
Analyze Another Website