Skip to main content

Is wunderground.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Weather Underground Reviews

wunderground.com favicon

Is wunderground.com Safe? Security Analysis for Weather Underground

Check if wunderground.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaN/alarge
Angular (ng-version=19.2.2)Google FontsMapbox (tiles.mapbox.com)Taboola (taboola.com)Amazon Ad System+5 more
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 9:09:57 PM
64
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Weather Underground is a well-established weather information provider offering local and long-range forecasts, weather news, maps, and severe weather alerts. The website targets a broad audience interested in weather conditions worldwide and operates primarily on an advertising-supported business model. The site features a modern Angular framework with Material Design components, integrating multiple third-party advertising and tracking services to monetize content. Privacy and terms of service policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, although direct contact information and security policies are not publicly disclosed. The security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and basic security headers, but could benefit from enhanced security headers and script integrity checks. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy platform for weather information.

Detected Technologies

Angular (ng-version=19.2.2)Google FontsMapbox (tiles.mapbox.com)Taboola (taboola.com)Amazon Ad SystemGoogle Ad ServicesScorecard ResearchNew RelicCriteoCloudfront CDN

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company holds a strong market position in the media sector focused on weather services, leveraging partnerships with major advertising networks and content recommendation platforms like Taboola. The business model relies on extensive advertising and user engagement through mobile apps and web services. The website's technical infrastructure is modern and scalable, supporting a large user base with interactive features and real-time weather data. However, the absence of visible registrant data and WHOIS information suggests privacy protection or registrar restrictions, which slightly impacts transparency. The company maintains good compliance with privacy regulations and offers a user-friendly experience, positioning itself competitively in the weather information market.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and some security headers present. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the analyzed content. However, the site relies heavily on third-party scripts and advertising networks, which introduces potential risks if not regularly audited. The lack of publicly available security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure programs indicates room for improvement in transparency and security governance. Overall, the site is secure for general users but should enhance its security framework and communication to stakeholders.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement Content-Security-Policy (CSP) headers to mitigate cross-site scripting risks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Weather Underground

Description:

Weather Underground provides local & long-range weather forecasts, weather reports, maps & tropical weather conditions for locations worldwide

Key Services:
Local weather forecastsWeather news and blogsWeather maps and radarSevere weather alertsMobile weather apps
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Angular (ng-version=19.2.2)Google FontsMapbox (tiles.mapbox.com)Taboola (taboola.com)Amazon Ad SystemGoogle Ad ServicesScorecard ResearchNew RelicCriteoCloudfront CDN
Frameworks:
Angular
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Scorecard ResearchNew Relic
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Amazon Ad SystemGoogle Ad ServicesRubicon ProjectOpenXCasale MediaTaboolaCriteo
Tracking Pixels:
Scorecard ResearchMoat AdsTaboola
Marketing Tools:
Google Tag ServicesNew Relic
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

65/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a:zgateway.zuora.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:amazonses.com include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.salesforce.com ~all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

80/100
Score

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:weather.com
Issuer:DigiCert TLS Hybrid ECC SHA384 2020 CA1
Valid Until:2/14/2026 (134 days)
SANs:weather.com, *.cogads.weather.com, *.dev.cogads.weather.com +21 more

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
30 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(178 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:23.54.13.169
AAAA Records:2a02:26f0:9500:a92::2e03, 2a02:26f0:9500:aa5::2e03
Name Servers:
a1-70.akam.net
a10-65.akam.net
a11-66.akam.net
a13-67.akam.net
a14-64.akam.net
a24-65.akam.net
MX Records:
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1647868880, TTL: 60s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:29ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a:zgateway.zuora.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:amazonses.com include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.salesforce.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Angular 19 with Material Design components, ensuring a modern and responsive user interface. It integrates multiple advertising and tracking services including Amazon Ad System, Google Ads, Taboola, and Criteo, which are common in media websites. The use of Google Fonts and Mapbox indicates reliance on popular CDN and mapping services. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data. Hosting details are not explicitly found, but the presence of Cloudfront CDN suggests a robust content delivery network. Technical risks mainly stem from third-party dependencies and the need for enhanced security headers.
Analyze Another Website