Skip to main content

Is wxw.best a Scam? Security Check Results - PrivacyGuardian.org llc Reviews

P

Is wxw.best Safe? Security Analysis for PrivacyGuardian.org llc

Check if wxw.best is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherUnited Statessmall
Cloudflare DNSGoogle FontsCloudflare Insightsanalytics.date
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 6:24:23 PM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website wxw.best is currently a parked domain page indicating the domain is available for sale. It provides minimal content limited to contact information including an email address on a different domain (wxw.moe) and a Telegram link. There is no business operation or service described on the site, and no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present. The domain is registered through a privacy protection service (PrivacyGuardian.org llc) based in the US, which is typical for domains held for resale or parking. The domain was created in late 2022 and is set to expire in 2025, consistent with a domain investment lifecycle. Technically, the site uses Cloudflare DNS and includes Google Fonts and analytics.date tracking scripts along with Cloudflare Insights for analytics. The site lacks security headers and DNSSEC is not enabled, which are areas for improvement. The SSL configuration is presumed good due to Cloudflare usage, but no explicit HTTPS enforcement or redirects were detected in the provided data. The site is basic in design and content, with poor SEO and accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site shows a low maturity posture with missing security headers and no visible incident response or security policies. The use of privacy protection for WHOIS is justified given the domain parking business model. No adult or explicit content was detected, and the site is safe for general audiences. Overall, the site scores low on content quality, business credibility, and privacy compliance, reflecting its status as a parked domain rather than an active business website.

Detected Technologies

Cloudflare DNSGoogle FontsCloudflare Insightsanalytics.date

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The domain wxw.best is positioned as a domain for sale, targeting domain investors or buyers interested in acquiring short, brandable domains. There is no active business or service offering, and no revenue streams or partnerships are evident. The registrant uses a privacy protection service, which is common in domain parking. The business model is domain parking and resale, with no operational footprint. The lack of business information and policies limits trust and credibility. The target audience is domain buyers rather than end consumers. There are no indicators of growth or strategic partnerships.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

f*****@wxw.moe

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of the website is minimal. While HTTPS is presumably enabled via Cloudflare, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended best practice for domain security. There are no visible forms or inputs, reducing attack surface, but also no incident response or security policies published. The use of privacy protection for WHOIS is appropriate for the domain parking use case. Overall, the site lacks advanced security measures and compliance indicators, reflecting its limited operational scope.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

PrivacyGuardian.org llc

Description:

The website is a parked domain page indicating the domain wxw.best is available for sale. It provides contact information for inquiries but no business operations or services are described.

Key Services:
Domain sale
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Cloudflare DNSGoogle FontsCloudflare Insightsanalytics.date
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited set
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
analytics.dateCloudflare Insights
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
analytics.dateCloudflare Insights
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is a parked domain page with minimal content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=86400; includeSubDomains"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 80 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:wxw.best
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/22/2025 (80 days)
SANs:wxw.best, *.wxw.best

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
2 years(established)
Expiry Risk
medium(62 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:172.67.191.249, 104.21.11.112
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3034::6815:b70, 2606:4700:3031::ac43:bff9
Name Servers:
alberto.ns.cloudflare.com
rachel.ns.cloudflare.com
SOA:Serial: 2379205107, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:62ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses Cloudflare DNS and hosting infrastructure, Google Fonts for typography, and analytics.date along with Cloudflare Insights for visitor tracking. The HTML is minimal and basic, with inline CSS for styling. No CMS or frameworks were detected. Performance is moderate given the minimal content. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but functional. SEO optimization is poor due to lack of meta tags and structured data. The site is simple and lightweight but lacks modern technical enhancements or rich content.
Analyze Another Website