Skip to main content

Is wxw.fail a Scam? Security Check Results - wxw.fail Reviews

W

Is wxw.fail Safe? Security Analysis for Domain for Sale

Check if wxw.fail is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Cloudflare DNSJavaScriptGoogle Fonts
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 6:24:07 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website wxw.fail is currently a parked domain page indicating the domain is available for sale. It provides minimal business information, limited to contact details via email and Telegram. The domain is relatively new, registered in October 2022, and hosted via Cloudflare DNS services. The site lacks any substantive content, business description, or legal policies, reflecting its status as a placeholder rather than an active business site. Technically, the site uses basic JavaScript and Google Fonts, with tracking scripts from analytics.date and Cloudflare Insights. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no forms or user data collection mechanisms exist. Overall, the site is low in content quality, business credibility, and privacy compliance, suitable only as a domain sale landing page.

Detected Technologies

Cloudflare DNSJavaScriptGoogle Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The domain wxw.fail is positioned as a domain resale asset rather than an operational business. There is no evidence of a company or business entity operating behind the domain. The target audience is domain investors or buyers. The business model is straightforward domain parking and resale. No market positioning, partnerships, or revenue streams are evident. The contact information is limited and does not indicate a formal business structure. The domain is registered with a reputable registrar but lacks DNSSEC and other advanced security features. No growth indicators or strategic partnerships are visible.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

f*****@wxw.moe

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of the website is minimal. HTTPS is enabled, which is a positive baseline. However, no DNSSEC is configured, and no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are present. The domain status clientTransferProhibited helps prevent unauthorized transfers. No incident response or security policies are published. Tracking scripts are present but no privacy or cookie consent mechanisms are implemented. The site does not collect user data via forms, reducing attack surface but also limiting functionality. Overall, the security maturity is low, appropriate for a parked domain but insufficient for an active business site.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and integrity.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

This website is a domain parking page indicating the domain wxw.fail is available for sale. Contact information is provided for potential buyers.

Key Services:
Domain sale
Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Cloudflare DNSJavaScriptGoogle Fonts
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
analytics.dateCloudflare Insights
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
analytics.datecloudflareinsights.com
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is a parked domain page with minimal content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 77 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:wxw.fail
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/19/2025 (77 days)
SANs:wxw.fail, *.wxw.fail

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
2 years(established)
Expiry Risk
medium(63 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:188.114.96.1, 188.114.97.1
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3035::6815:5768, 2606:4700:3037::ac43:a95e
Name Servers:
alberto.ns.cloudflare.com
rachel.ns.cloudflare.com
SOA:Serial: 2378944284, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:78ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is a simple static HTML page served via Cloudflare DNS and hosting infrastructure. It uses Google Fonts for typography and includes JavaScript tracking scripts from analytics.date and Cloudflare Insights. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected. The site performance is moderate given minimal content. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic due to minimal design effort. SEO optimization is poor with no meta tags or structured data present. The technical debt is low but the site lacks modern security and privacy features. There is opportunity to modernize with improved security headers, privacy compliance, and richer content if the domain is developed beyond parking.
Analyze Another Website