Skip to main content

Is wzhile.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 中国特产供求网 Reviews

wzhile.com favicon

Is wzhile.com Safe? Security Analysis for 中国特产供求网

Check if wzhile.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

RetailChinasmall
jQueryBootstrapFont AwesomeSwiper
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 11:40:26 AM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

中国特产供求网是一家专注于中国各地土特产、特色美食及旅游景点资讯的内容门户网站,提供丰富的生活百科和文化交流内容,面向中国广大消费者和旅游爱好者。网站内容丰富,涵盖特产介绍、旅游攻略及相关文化信息,定位为中国土特产及旅游资讯领域的内容分享平台。技术上,网站采用了jQuery、Bootstrap和Font Awesome等成熟前端技术,具备良好的移动端适配和基础SEO优化,但缺乏高级安全配置和隐私合规措施。安全方面,网站启用了HTTPS,但未配置DNSSEC及安全HTTP头,缺少隐私政策和安全事件响应信息,存在一定的合规和安全风险。整体风险评估为中等,建议加强安全头配置、完善隐私合规政策,并明确联系方式以提升用户信任和合规性。

Detected Technologies

jQueryBootstrapFont AwesomeSwiper

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

该网站作为中国土特产和旅游资讯的内容聚合平台,主要通过发布特产介绍和旅游攻略吸引用户,目标客户为关注中国地方特产和旅游的消费者。其商业模式可能依赖广告和合作推广,网站内容更新频繁,显示出一定的活跃度和市场潜力。友情链接指向多个相关行业网站,显示一定的合作生态。缺乏明确的企业注册信息和联系方式,可能影响商业信誉和用户信任。整体市场定位为小型内容门户,具备成长空间但需加强品牌和合规建设。

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

网站安全成熟度较低,虽然启用了HTTPS保障数据传输安全,但未启用DNSSEC,且缺少关键安全HTTP头如Content-Security-Policy和HSTS,增加了潜在的中间人攻击和内容注入风险。网站未公开安全政策或事件响应联系方式,缺乏安全文化和合规意识。WHOIS信息显示域名注册人为注册商公司,非实际运营方,存在一定的信任隐患。建议尽快完善安全配置,公开安全政策,并加强域名注册信息透明度以提升整体安全形象。

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

启用DNSSEC以提升域名解析安全性。

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

中国特产供求网

Description:

中国特产供求网是中国最大的土特产网站,汇集全国各地特产、特色美食、水果蔬菜、农副产品、特产礼品、工艺品、中国名小吃、旅游景点推荐、旅游攻略路线、民间风俗、特产文化交流及生活百科大全等内容,致力于成为中国最具价值的特产分享导购网站。

Key Services:
特产资讯发布旅游景点推荐生活百科分享特产文化交流
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryBootstrapFont AwesomeSwiper
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Form uses POST method

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Baidu linksubmit push.js
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 10 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

10 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:103.41.80.47
Name Servers:
ns1.julydns.comDNS only
ns2.julydns.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 1747330607, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:47ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

网站采用传统前端技术栈,包括jQuery、Bootstrap和Font Awesome,页面结构清晰,支持移动端访问,SEO基础良好。未检测到现代前端框架或CMS,可能为定制开发或轻量级CMS。性能表现中等,未见明显加载瓶颈。缺乏高级安全配置和隐私合规工具,存在技术债务和合规风险。建议逐步引入现代前端技术和安全最佳实践,提升用户体验和安全保障。
Analyze Another Website