Skip to main content

Is xcbtc.com a Scam? Security Check Results - xcBTC Reviews

xcbtc.com favicon

Is xcbtc.com Safe? Security Analysis for xcBTC

Check if xcbtc.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/asmall
WordPressGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerjQueryRoyalSlider+2 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 5:09:30 PM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

xcBTC is a specialized financial technology project focused on tokenizing Bitcoin across multiple blockchains such as Etherlink, Ethereum, and Tezos. It offers a decentralized, transparent, and compliant solution that enables Bitcoin to be used with smart contracts and blockchain applications. The governance model involves distributed Keyholders managing multi-signature wallets and Gatekeepers handling KYC/AML compliance and user interactions. The project positions itself as a cost-effective and secure bridge between Bitcoin and other blockchain ecosystems, targeting cryptocurrency users, developers, and regulated financial entities. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Impreza theme, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and includes transparency features such as public BTC custody addresses and links to security audits. However, some security best practices like HTTP security headers and a formal security policy are not explicitly present. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. The governance model's use of multi-signature wallets and regulated operators adds trustworthiness. No critical vulnerabilities or WAF blocking were detected. Privacy compliance is supported by a clear privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism, though incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent. Overall, xcBTC demonstrates a mature and professional online presence with strong business credibility and technical implementation. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and accessibility could further enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

WordPressGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerjQueryRoyalSliderFontAwesomeMaterial Icons

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

xcBTC operates in the niche intersection of blockchain finance and tokenization, providing a bridge for Bitcoin to be utilized on other blockchains with smart contract capabilities. Its competitive advantage lies in its decentralized governance, regulatory compliance, and automation that reduces costs. Revenue streams likely include fees from token minting, burning, and Gatekeeper services. The target customers include institutional investors, blockchain developers, and crypto users seeking Bitcoin interoperability. The partnership ecosystem includes reputable financial and blockchain service providers such as Lexr, Mt Pelerin, Hex Trust, and Sygnum, indicating strong industry relationships. The project has been active since 2013, suggesting stability and experience in the market.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of xcBTC is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The multi-signature wallet governance model and regulated Gatekeepers provide operational security and compliance. The presence of security audit links and transparency of BTC custody addresses further strengthen trust. However, the absence of HTTP security headers, a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represent gaps that could be addressed to improve security maturity and incident readiness. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, indicating open accessibility. Overall, the security culture appears proactive but could benefit from formalized policies and disclosures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

xcBTC

Description:

Decentralised, transparent and cost-effective: xcBTC delivers the power of Bitcoin as a token to the world of blockchains.

Key Services:
Bitcoin tokenization on blockchains (Etherlink, Ethereum, Tezos)Multi-signature governance by KeyholdersKYC/AML compliance via GatekeepersSupply management via minting and burning of xcBTC
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerjQueryRoyalSliderFontAwesomeMaterial Icons
Frameworks:
WordPress CMSImpreza Theme
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of multi-signature wallets for governance
  • Links to security audits

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 83 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:94.126.17.100
Name Servers:
uni1.domainsure.comDNS only
uni2.domainsure.netDNS only
uni3.domainsure.orgDNS only
MX Records:
5: xcbtc-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1741083081, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:166ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a mature CMS platform (WordPress) with a professional theme (Impreza) and uses common web technologies such as jQuery and Google Analytics. The site is mobile responsive and well-optimized for SEO with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with some large images and external font loading. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified but domain registration is via easyDNS Technologies Inc. The site uses asynchronous loading for analytics scripts to reduce blocking. There is no evidence of technical debt or deprecated technologies, but security headers are missing which is a technical risk. Overall, the infrastructure is stable and modern but could be improved with enhanced security configurations.
Analyze Another Website