Skip to main content

Is xitongcheng.com a Scam? Security Check Results - xitongcheng.com Reviews

X

Is xitongcheng.com Safe? Security Analysis for 欢迎来此游戏站95.216.242.762025/08/05 00:10:24

Check if xitongcheng.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
JavaScriptiframe embedding
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 4:11:23 PM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website xitongcheng.com appears to be a minimalistic gaming site primarily serving Chinese-speaking users, as indicated by the language and content. The site mainly consists of an iframe embedding external content from baike.179ll.cn and uses JavaScript to display visitor IP and local time. There is no substantive business description, contact information, or user engagement features visible. The domain is registered since 2013 via GoDaddy, indicating a mature domain age, but the site lacks professionalism and completeness in content and policies. Technically, the site uses basic JavaScript and iframe embedding without modern frameworks or CMS. Security posture is weak with no HTTPS enforced on all resources, no security headers, and no DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is absent with no privacy or cookie policies. Overall, the site presents low trustworthiness and poor user experience.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptiframe embedding

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business model and market positioning are unclear due to lack of information. The site targets general gaming users but does not provide clear services or monetization details. No contact or corporate information is provided, limiting business credibility. The external iframe content suggests reliance on third-party content providers. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The site likely operates as a small-scale or hobbyist gaming portal with limited market presence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is low. The absence of HTTPS on all calls, lack of security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies indicate poor security hygiene. DNSSEC is not enabled, and mixed content risks exist due to HTTP API calls. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. The domain registration is standard but does not compensate for the weak site security. The site is vulnerable to common web risks and lacks compliance with GDPR or other privacy regulations.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS site-wide and ensure all external resources use HTTPS to eliminate mixed content risks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

The website appears to be a gaming site welcoming visitors, but no detailed business description is provided.

Key Services:
gaming content (implied)
Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptiframe embedding
Performance:

slow

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal and mostly an iframe embedding external content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 86 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:45.197.47.140
Name Servers:
ns71.domaincontrol.comDNS only
ns72.domaincontrol.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2025073102, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:136ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The site uses basic JavaScript and iframe embedding without modern frameworks or CMS. Performance is likely slow due to full-page iframe usage and external dependencies. Mobile optimization is basic but present. Accessibility and SEO are poor due to minimal content and lack of meta tags beyond viewport and charset. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, indicating minimal data collection. Hosting details are limited to registrar information; no CDN or advanced hosting detected. Technical debt is high due to lack of modern web practices and security features.
Analyze Another Website