Skip to main content

Is xrjplc.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 厦门兴锐嘉进出口有限公司 Reviews

Is xrjplc.com Safe? Security Analysis for 厦门兴锐嘉进出口有限公司

Check if xrjplc.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingChinamedium
WordPressWPBakery Page BuilderSlider RevolutionWooCommercejQuery+1 more
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 12:12:49 AM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

厦门兴锐嘉进出口有限公司是一家专注于大型进口自动化系统备件销售的中型企业,业务涵盖分散式控制系统、PLC模块、机器人系统及大型伺服控制系统模块备件。公司拥有丰富的行业经验,服务范围覆盖中国多个地区,致力于为工业自动化领域客户提供高质量产品和系统集成服务。网站内容丰富,采用WordPress平台,集成了多种现代插件以提升用户体验和SEO表现。技术架构稳定,支持移动设备访问,整体性能表现中等偏上。安全方面,网站启用了HTTPS,但缺少部分安全头和隐私合规文档,存在一定合规风险。WHOIS信息缺失,需关注域名注册状态以确保业务连续性和信任度。

Detected Technologies

WordPressWPBakery Page BuilderSlider RevolutionWooCommercejQueryWP Rocket

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

该公司定位于工业自动化备件市场,主要面向制造业、能源和运输行业的企业客户。通过销售国际知名品牌的PLC模块和系统备件,结合系统集成服务,形成B2B业务模式。公司快速扩展,市场覆盖广泛,具备一定的行业竞争力。网站展示了多品牌合作关系和丰富的产品线,体现出较强的供应链资源。缺乏公开的隐私政策和安全响应机制,可能影响客户信任和合规性。建议加强合规建设和安全管理以提升市场竞争力。

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@xrjdcs.com

Phone Numbers (2)

153*******
153*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

网站采用HTTPS保障数据传输安全,未检测到明显的安全漏洞或敏感信息泄露。缺少安全相关HTTP头部配置,未见安全事件响应或漏洞披露页面,表明安全管理尚处于基础阶段。未发现恶意脚本或第三方追踪工具,用户隐私保护措施不足。建议补充安全头配置,完善隐私政策,建立安全事件响应流程,定期审计插件和依赖库,提升整体安全成熟度。

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

部署并配置安全HTTP头部,如Content-Security-Policy、X-Frame-Options和X-Content-Type-Options。

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

厦门兴锐嘉进出口有限公司

Description:

厦门兴锐嘉进出口有限公司是一家多年专业从事大型进口系统(集散式控制系统、可编程控制器、冗余容错控制系统、机器人系统)备件销售。主营品牌包括Foxboro,Tricon,Ovation,Motorola,Xycom,ABB,Allen-Bradley,Schneider,Siemens,GE Fanuc,Yaskawa,Woodward等。公司业务遍及全国多个地区,秉承质量保证,诚信服务,及时到位的宗旨。

Key Services:
进口自动化系统备件销售系统集成
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressWPBakery Page BuilderSlider RevolutionWooCommercejQueryWP Rocket
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Lazy loading scripts
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
All in One SEOWP Rocket
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content in Chinese language.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 59 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:47.119.131.69
Name Servers:
dns21.hichina.comDNS only
dns22.hichina.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2025032613, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:472ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

网站基于WordPress构建,使用WPBakery和Slider Revolution等流行插件,技术栈成熟且广泛支持。采用WP Rocket进行性能优化,支持脚本懒加载和资源合并,提升加载速度。页面设计响应式良好,适配移动设备。SEO优化较好,包含丰富的元标签和结构化数据。缺少部分安全配置和隐私合规内容,存在技术债务风险。建议持续技术更新和安全加固,保持平台稳定和安全。
Analyze Another Website