Skip to main content

Is xuexicankao.com a Scam? Security Check Results - xuexicankao.com Reviews

X

Is xuexicankao.com Safe? Security Analysis for xuexicankao.com

Check if xuexicankao.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherChinasmall
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 2:07:05 PM
45
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website at xuexicankao.com is currently minimalistic, containing only a simple 'Hello world!' message with no additional content, metadata, or business information. The domain is registered since 2015 with Alibaba Cloud Computing (Beijing) Co., Ltd. as the registrar and hosting provider, indicating a stable and legitimate registration. However, the lack of meaningful content and absence of privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies suggest the site is either inactive or a placeholder. From a technical perspective, the website lacks modern web technologies, SEO optimization, and accessibility features. There is no evidence of HTTPS or security headers, which poses significant security risks. No forms, contact details, or social media links are present, limiting user engagement and trust. Security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS and security best practices. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The absence of privacy compliance mechanisms such as GDPR indicators or cookie consent further reduces the site's compliance standing. Overall, the website presents a high risk due to minimal content, lack of security measures, and absence of compliance documentation. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS, adding privacy and cookie policies, enhancing website content, and establishing clear contact and security incident channels to improve trust and security posture.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website does not provide any explicit business information, company name, or description. The domain age and hosting provider suggest a legitimate registration, but the lack of content and contact details indicates no active business presence or market positioning. No revenue models, partnerships, or growth indicators are discernible. The site appears to be either under development, abandoned, or a placeholder with no competitive advantages or strategic business insights available.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security posture is poor. The absence of HTTPS and security headers exposes users to potential interception and attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. There is no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, limiting the ability to handle security events effectively. The site does not demonstrate any security best practices or certifications, increasing risk exposure.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all communications.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is extremely minimal with only 'Hello world!' text.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

95/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 77 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:xuexicankao.com
Issuer:R11
Valid Until:10/19/2025 (77 days)
SANs:www.xuexicankao.com, xuexicankao.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:39.102.211.246
Name Servers:
dns10.hichina.comDNS only
dns9.hichina.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2025032613, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:451ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website's technical implementation is minimal, with no detectable frameworks, CMS, or modern technologies. The HTML content is basic and lacks metadata, SEO tags, or structured data. Hosting is provided by Alibaba Cloud, a reputable provider, but no performance or mobile optimization features are evident. The site lacks accessibility features and does not appear to be optimized for search engines or user experience. Technical debt is high due to the absence of fundamental web standards and security configurations.
Analyze Another Website