Skip to main content

Is xvideos.net a Scam? Security Check Results - xvideos.net Reviews

X

Is xvideos.net Safe? Security Analysis for Xvideos.net - XXX Porn Videos Tube

Check if xvideos.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaN/alarge
AMP (Accelerated Mobile Pages)HTML5CSS3
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 8:24:41 AM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Xvideos.net operates as an adult entertainment portal linking users to free pornographic video content and related Android applications. It serves a mature audience seeking adult video streaming and alternative access points for restricted regions. The website leverages AMP technology for mobile optimization but maintains a basic design and limited content quality. Security posture is minimal with no advanced headers or policies detected, and privacy compliance is lacking due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. The domain is long-established and consistent with the business history, indicating legitimacy despite limited transparency. Overall, the site functions primarily as a content aggregator and referral platform within the adult media sector.

Detected Technologies

AMP (Accelerated Mobile Pages)HTML5CSS3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website holds a strong market position as a major free adult video content aggregator, linking to well-known partner sites and apps. Its business model relies on advertising and content distribution within the adult entertainment industry. The target audience is adults-only, with services focused on video streaming and app access. The lack of direct contact or corporate information suggests a low-profile operational approach common in adult content businesses. The partnership ecosystem includes alternative domains and app distribution channels to circumvent regional restrictions. Growth indicators are not explicit but the domain age and market presence imply sustained demand.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is low with only basic HTTPS usage and no detected security headers or incident response contacts. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly regarding GDPR. No forms or data collection mechanisms reduce attack surface but also limit user engagement features. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. The site would benefit from implementing security best practices such as CSP, X-Frame-Options, and clear incident response channels to enhance trust and resilience.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Xvideos.net is a website linking to adult content platforms and apps, providing access to free pornographic videos and related services.

Key Services:
Free adult video streamingAndroid app distributionAlternative access sites for restricted regions
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
AMP (Accelerated Mobile Pages)HTML5CSS3
Frameworks:
AMP Framework
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled (implied by canonical link https://www.xvideos.net and AMP usage)

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

100/100
Score
No issues found
SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google0
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:gqi2sotm@ag.eu.dmarcian.com
Forensic Reports:gqi2sotm@fr.eu.dmarcian.com
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 81 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:141.0.173.175
Name Servers:
ns1.serverstack.comDNS only
ns2.serverstack.comDNS only
ns3.serverstack.comDNS only
ns4.serverstack.comDNS only
MX Records:
30: aspmx3.googlemail.com
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
30: aspmx2.googlemail.com
30: aspmx4.googlemail.com
20: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx.l.google.com
30: aspmx5.googlemail.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses AMP technology to optimize mobile performance and improve loading speed. The HTML and CSS are valid but basic, with minimal interactive elements and no forms. Hosting is managed via ServerStack as indicated by nameservers. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization but limited SEO and accessibility features. No CMS or advanced frameworks detected beyond AMP. The site lacks analytics or tracking scripts in the provided content, suggesting minimal user data collection. Technical risks include absence of security headers and DNSSEC, which could expose users to certain attacks.
Analyze Another Website