Skip to main content

Is xxx.com a Scam? Security Check Results - xxx.com Reviews

xxx.com favicon

Is xxx.com Safe? Security Analysis for XXX.com - XXX Sex Videos - Free Porn Movies

Check if xxx.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaN/asmall
Google AnalyticsRoboto fontCSSHTML5
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 7:19:21 AM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website www.xxx.com operates as an adult content aggregator, providing free access and referral links to major adult video platforms such as Xvideos, XNXX, Bangbros, and others. It targets an adult audience seeking explicit pornographic content, offering descriptions and links to premium and free adult video services. The site claims to have been active since 2004 but lacks verifiable domain registration data, raising questions about its legitimacy and transparency. Technically, the site uses basic HTML and CSS with Google Analytics for tracking, but lacks modern security features and privacy compliance mechanisms. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact or company information is provided, which reduces trustworthiness and compliance posture. The site does not appear to be blocked or protected by a WAF, allowing full content access.

Detected Technologies

Google AnalyticsRoboto fontCSSHTML5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business model is primarily affiliate marketing and advertising, driving traffic to well-known adult content platforms. The site positions itself as a free resource for adult entertainment consumers, leveraging popular adult brands to attract visitors. The lack of direct content hosting reduces operational complexity but also limits control over content quality and compliance. The absence of company information and domain registration transparency suggests a low-profile or privacy-focused operator. The site’s market presence is modest, with basic branding and limited user engagement features. Growth potential depends on traffic volume and affiliate partnerships with major adult content providers.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is weak, with no visible HTTPS confirmation or security headers in the provided data. The site lacks privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance risk under GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or security contact information is available, limiting the ability to report abuse or vulnerabilities. The use of Google Analytics indicates some level of user tracking but without clear privacy disclosures. The missing WHOIS data and domain registration transparency further reduce trust and increase risk. Overall, the site is vulnerable to reputational and compliance risks and should improve security and privacy practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.

✨Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

XXX Sex Videos - Free Porn Movies at XXX.com

Key Services:
Referral links to adult video platformsInformation about premium adult video services
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google AnalyticsRoboto fontCSSHTML5
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is an adult content aggregator linking to major pornographic platforms.

πŸ›‘οΈSecurity Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

πŸ‘€GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

πŸ›‘οΈNIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

πŸ“§Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC record found

HIGH

DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

πŸ†SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 81 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

πŸ“ŠDNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
31 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(327 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:141.0.173.173
Name Servers:
ns1.serverstack.com
ns2.serverstack.com
ns3.serverstack.com
ns4.serverstack.com
MX Records:
10: xxx.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

⚑Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

πŸ”§Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses basic HTML5 and CSS with the Roboto font and includes Google Analytics for tracking. There is no evidence of a CMS or advanced frameworks. Performance appears moderate with no explicit optimization or accessibility features detected. The site is mobile responsive at a basic level but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility enhancements. No forms or interactive elements are present, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the provided data. Technical debt appears low but modernization and security hardening are recommended.
Analyze Another Website