Skip to main content

Is xxxlesnina.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Lesnina XXXL Reviews

xxxlesnina.com favicon

Is xxxlesnina.com Safe? Security Analysis for Lesnina XXXL

Check if xxxlesnina.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

RetailN/amedium
jQueryBootstrapSlick CarouselWOW.jsGoogle Analytics+1 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 11:56:44 PM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Lesnina XXXL is a retail-focused website presenting a regional furniture and home goods business. The site targets a general audience primarily in German-speaking regions, with partner links to Croatian, Slovenian, and Serbian domains. The business model appears to be retail with a regional market position. The website is built on WordPress using common libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Slick Carousel, and employs Yoast SEO for search optimization. Google Analytics is used for user tracking, indicating moderate digital maturity. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacking security headers and privacy policies. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy and registration transparency. Overall, the site is functional and professionally branded but lacks critical compliance and contact information, which impacts trust and credibility.

Detected Technologies

jQueryBootstrapSlick CarouselWOW.jsGoogle AnalyticsYoast SEO

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website positions Lesnina XXXL as a regional retail furniture provider with partner sites in neighboring countries, suggesting a multi-national presence in the Balkans region. The business leverages WordPress CMS for content management and uses standard marketing tools like Google Analytics and Yoast SEO. The lack of detailed business information, contact data, and certifications limits the ability to fully assess market positioning and competitive advantages. The presence of partner domains indicates a networked business model. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not discernible from the site content. Strategic partnerships appear limited to regional sister sites. The website content is basic and serves primarily as a brand presence rather than a full e-commerce platform.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level is basic. HTTPS is implemented, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No forms or input fields are present on the main page, minimizing immediate risk of injection attacks. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which is a gap in security culture and readiness. The missing WHOIS data is a significant red flag for domain legitimacy and trust. Overall, the site requires improvements in security best practices and compliance to enhance its security posture.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Lesnina XXXL

Description:

Dies ist eine Beispiel-Seite. Sie unterscheidet sich von Beiträgen, weil sie stets an der selben Stelle bleibt und (bei den meisten Themes) in der Navigationsleiste angezeigt wird. Die meisten Leute starten mit einer „Über uns“-Seite mit einer Vorstellung für mögliche Besucher der Website. Dort könnte zum Beispiel stehen: Hallo! Tagsüber arbeite ich als Fahrradkurier, nachts […]

Key Services:
Retail furniture and home goods
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryBootstrapSlick CarouselWOW.jsGoogle AnalyticsYoast SEO
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Yoast SEO
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 88 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
11 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(36 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:217.196.150.139
Name Servers:
ns10.managed-ip.com
ns11.managed-ip.info
ns12.managed-ip.info
ns9.managed-ip.com
SOA:Serial: 2024050700, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:98ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a standard WordPress CMS platform with common front-end libraries including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Slick Carousel for UI components and animations. Yoast SEO plugin is used for search engine optimization, and Google Analytics is integrated for user behavior tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate with no evident broken elements. However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features and security headers. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. The technical stack is modern but basic, suitable for a regional retail presence. Opportunities exist to modernize security configurations and improve compliance-related technical implementations.
Analyze Another Website