Skip to main content

Is xzw.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 星座屋 Reviews

Is xzw.com Safe? Security Analysis for 星座屋

Check if xzw.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaChinamedium
jQueryJavaScriptHTML5CSS3
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 12:28:53 PM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

星座屋 is a Chinese-language astrology and horoscope website offering a wide range of content including zodiac signs, personality analysis, tarot card tutorials, dream interpretation, and psychological tests. It targets Chinese-speaking users interested in astrology and related lifestyle topics. The site is well-established with consistent branding and a moderate-sized audience. Technically, it uses standard web technologies such as jQuery and JavaScript, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is basic with HTTPS implied but lacking advanced security headers and explicit privacy mechanisms. WHOIS data is missing, which raises some concerns about domain transparency. Overall, the site is functional and content-rich but could improve in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Detected Technologies

jQueryJavaScriptHTML5CSS3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website operates in the media sector focusing on astrology and lifestyle content. It leverages advertising and user engagement through various interactive features like quizzes and tarot readings. The presence of ICP and content licenses indicates regulatory compliance in China. The site has a broad partnership ecosystem with many external linked domains, mostly content and social media related. The business model is content-driven with monetization likely through ads and possibly affiliate marketing. The target audience is primarily Chinese-speaking astrology enthusiasts. The lack of explicit company contact details and WHOIS transparency may impact business credibility.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options. No incident response or security policy information is published. There is no cookie consent mechanism detected, which may be a compliance gap under privacy regulations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The site uses third-party analytics scripts from Baidu and CNZZ, which implies moderate user tracking. Overall, the security posture is basic and could be enhanced by implementing security headers, privacy notices, and incident response contacts.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve security posture.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

星座屋

Description:

星座屋专业星座运程预测网,提供星座、个性、开运方法、运势、配对、解梦以及心理测试、血型、生肖、塔罗牌、算命、风水等星相命理信息。

Key Services:
Horoscope and astrology contentZodiac and blood type personality analysisTarot card tutorials and readingsPsychological testsDream interpretationChinese lunar calendar and fortuneAstrological chart analysis
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryJavaScriptHTML5CSS3
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Baidu AnalyticsCNZZ
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Baidu AnalyticsCNZZ
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content in Chinese language focused on astrology and related topics.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.163.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc@qiye.163.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

143 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
25 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(141 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:120.77.250.5
Name Servers:
f1g1ns1.dnspod.net
f1g1ns2.dnspod.net
MX Records:
5: hzmx01.mxmail.netease.com
10: hzmx02.mxmail.netease.com
SOA:Serial: 1751531482, TTL: 180s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:361ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.163.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and jQuery. It loads multiple JavaScript files for common functions and site features. The site appears to be custom-built without a common CMS detected. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO meta tags present. There is no indication of modern frameworks like React or Angular. The hosting provider is not identified from the data. The site uses Baidu and CNZZ analytics for tracking. Technical debt is low but security and privacy features could be modernized.
Analyze Another Website