Skip to main content

Is yangtao.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 快洋淘指纹浏览器 Reviews

yangtao.com favicon

Is yangtao.com Safe? Security Analysis for 快洋淘指纹浏览器

Check if yangtao.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyChinamedium
Google Chrome core (Chromium)Vue.jsNuxt.jsWebP imagesSSL/TLS
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 6:32:24 PM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

快洋淘指纹浏览器是一款专注于多账号安全管理和防关联的浏览器软件,主要服务跨境电商卖家、广告投放运营者及多账号管理团队。该公司成立于2005年,拥有丰富的行业经验和稳定的市场地位。其产品通过模拟独立电脑信息和代理IP,实现多开浏览器窗口和账号隔离,保障账号安全,防止封号。网站内容丰富,用户评价积极,体现了良好的客户信任和市场认可。技术基础采用现代前端框架Vue.js和Nuxt.js,支持移动端优化,整体性能表现良好。安全方面,网站启用HTTPS并配置了多项安全头,保障数据传输安全,但缺少明确的安全政策和漏洞披露信息。建议完善隐私合规措施,增加安全响应渠道以提升整体安全成熟度。

Detected Technologies

Google Chrome core (Chromium)Vue.jsNuxt.jsWebP imagesSSL/TLS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

快洋淘浏览器定位于跨境电商及广告行业的多账号管理解决方案,提供多平台店铺管理、安全防御、团队协作及插件支持等核心功能。其商业模式基于软件销售和订阅服务,目标客户为需要管理大量账号的企业和团队。网站展示了多个合作伙伴,涵盖代理IP和电商工具,形成了较为完善的合作生态。内容专业且针对性强,体现出较高的行业专注度和竞争优势。公司规模中等,拥有超过350家合作伙伴,服务覆盖150多个国家,显示出较强的市场覆盖能力和国际化程度。

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@yangtao.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

网站安全配置较为完善,启用了HTTPS和多项安全头,防止常见的网络攻击和数据泄露。无明显敏感信息泄露或易受攻击的库。缺少公开的安全政策、事件响应流程和漏洞披露机制,可能影响用户对安全事件处理的信心。建议增加安全事件响应联系方式和安全披露渠道,提升安全透明度和用户信任。整体安全评分较高,但仍有提升空间以满足更严格的合规要求。

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

部署并展示完整的Cookie政策及用户同意机制,确保GDPR合规。

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

快洋淘指纹浏览器

Description:

快洋淘指纹浏览器,主要实现多开浏览器窗口、多登账号,防止窗口间产生关联、防止封号,每个窗口可以模拟独立的电脑信息,模拟不同的IP地址,使得相互间完全环境独立、隔离,避免关联封号。

Key Services:
多账号安全管理多开浏览器窗口防关联防封号代理IP支持团队协作管理
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Chrome core (Chromium)Vue.jsNuxt.jsWebP imagesSSL/TLS
Frameworks:
Vue.jsNuxt.js
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content in Chinese.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No MX records found

MEDIUM

Domain cannot receive email without MX records

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

10 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

50/100
Score

No MX Records

LOW

Domain cannot receive email without MX records

No Name Servers Found

HIGH

Unable to find name servers for domain

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
20 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(2125 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:163.53.19.13, 23.251.63.10
Name Servers:
ivan.dnspod.netWHOIS only
jack.dnspod.netWHOIS only

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:107ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

网站采用现代前端技术栈Vue.js和Nuxt.js,支持模块化加载和移动端优化,提升性能和用户体验。使用WebP格式图片优化加载速度。SEO优化良好,包含丰富的元数据和结构化数据。无明显技术债务或过时技术。缺少公开托管信息,建议监控托管环境安全。整体技术架构现代且稳定,适合持续扩展和维护。
Analyze Another Website